Zardnaar
Deity
A few years ago I had a social justice warrior knock on my door for Greenpeace. My roommate warned her she won't like me and good luck preaching.
She wanted to save the whales. Personally I like whales as well, my grand parents did work on a whaling station in the 1940's though and my mother was born in one.
I more or less told her Greenpeace has probably doomed more whales than they have saved. The average Japanese for example doesn't like eating whales and they lose money hunting them but when you get SJW bleating to them about not eating whales you make it a point of nationalism. Rationally the Japanese for example probably would have stopped eating whale by now but the conservative elements of Japanese society help fund it because they don't like being told what to do by outsider.
We would not stop eating cows for example if the Hindus told us to stop doing it. One thing I hate is stupid SJW who actually make what they are bleating about counter productive.
If you want to save whales shut up.
Same thing about going out to save all these people in the 3rd world with aid. Note I am not opposed to helping out the less fortunate at all. A famine like Ethiopia in the 1980's is now a standard occurrence every day now. Its a waste of time helping out nations that lack the infrastructure/civil society/institutions to make use of that aid.
Another example would be US policy in the middle east and supplying countries like Saudi Arabia with state of the art weapons systems. That is not gonna go well lets face it.
Anyway this SJW got offended when I suggested the best way to control population would be via using nuclear weapons, I was not being to serious but it was fun winding her up and it was the fastest and most efficient way of reducing the worlds population from 7 billion down to 2 billion which was what it was around WW2.
SJW's also want to eliminate nukes so we could do that by using a few of them. The environmental effects of a nuclear war would be bad of course but probably less destructive long terms than humans existing with our current population (and rising). Lets face it our species is parasitic, and something like Chernobyl has had beneficial results for the local wild life. A nuclear melt down is less destructive than local humans eating, crapping, driving cars and basically existing.
A more humane way with out nukes I suppose would be removing all state controls on things that are bad for us. Hell heroin, cocaine, alcohol could be handed out for free at high school and university. If we depleted our species into extinction that would be good for the planets and cats might eventually evolved thumbs. I would rather pay tax to hyper evolved kittehs than my government.
Evolution is caused by mutations, speed it up with a bit of atomic help. SJW also don't seem to like it when you point out that if they want to save the planet suicide is an option to reduce their carbon foot print but they do not like that idea for some reason.
When I run for office as world dictator I could make this official policy to run on. Imagine the sound bites you could use- "Vote for Me its the Last Vote you Will ever get". Not quite as catchy as "Make America Great" I admit and I do not have the great Orange (hair).
Overall though think of the long term benefits a nuclear weapons as population control policy could have. Just like WW2 wages would go up, it would be good for the environment and even the short term effects are still better than the short term effects of well us!!!!!
Moderator Action: Opening posts are supposed to lead into good discussions. This is rambling, incoherent and frequently trolling. Please do better in future. FP
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889
She wanted to save the whales. Personally I like whales as well, my grand parents did work on a whaling station in the 1940's though and my mother was born in one.
I more or less told her Greenpeace has probably doomed more whales than they have saved. The average Japanese for example doesn't like eating whales and they lose money hunting them but when you get SJW bleating to them about not eating whales you make it a point of nationalism. Rationally the Japanese for example probably would have stopped eating whale by now but the conservative elements of Japanese society help fund it because they don't like being told what to do by outsider.
We would not stop eating cows for example if the Hindus told us to stop doing it. One thing I hate is stupid SJW who actually make what they are bleating about counter productive.
If you want to save whales shut up.
Same thing about going out to save all these people in the 3rd world with aid. Note I am not opposed to helping out the less fortunate at all. A famine like Ethiopia in the 1980's is now a standard occurrence every day now. Its a waste of time helping out nations that lack the infrastructure/civil society/institutions to make use of that aid.
Another example would be US policy in the middle east and supplying countries like Saudi Arabia with state of the art weapons systems. That is not gonna go well lets face it.
Anyway this SJW got offended when I suggested the best way to control population would be via using nuclear weapons, I was not being to serious but it was fun winding her up and it was the fastest and most efficient way of reducing the worlds population from 7 billion down to 2 billion which was what it was around WW2.
SJW's also want to eliminate nukes so we could do that by using a few of them. The environmental effects of a nuclear war would be bad of course but probably less destructive long terms than humans existing with our current population (and rising). Lets face it our species is parasitic, and something like Chernobyl has had beneficial results for the local wild life. A nuclear melt down is less destructive than local humans eating, crapping, driving cars and basically existing.
A more humane way with out nukes I suppose would be removing all state controls on things that are bad for us. Hell heroin, cocaine, alcohol could be handed out for free at high school and university. If we depleted our species into extinction that would be good for the planets and cats might eventually evolved thumbs. I would rather pay tax to hyper evolved kittehs than my government.
Evolution is caused by mutations, speed it up with a bit of atomic help. SJW also don't seem to like it when you point out that if they want to save the planet suicide is an option to reduce their carbon foot print but they do not like that idea for some reason.
When I run for office as world dictator I could make this official policy to run on. Imagine the sound bites you could use- "Vote for Me its the Last Vote you Will ever get". Not quite as catchy as "Make America Great" I admit and I do not have the great Orange (hair).
Overall though think of the long term benefits a nuclear weapons as population control policy could have. Just like WW2 wages would go up, it would be good for the environment and even the short term effects are still better than the short term effects of well us!!!!!
Moderator Action: Opening posts are supposed to lead into good discussions. This is rambling, incoherent and frequently trolling. Please do better in future. FP
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889
Last edited by a moderator:
