yeah in 2018 ... So @metalhead asks you and you respond by linking a thread that you started a few months ago?, and try to pass that off as a response. this is so dishonest I don't know whether to laugh or cry
This statement is pretty misleading. First... your first post in this thread, which was 13 posts before mine... is clearly about the Clintons, despite you not using the actual word "Clinton". You first argue that rah's reference to the Clinton Foundation wasn't whataboutism, but instead simply a reference to another rich-person-named-Foundation besides the Trump Foundation. Then you complain that the GOP, and by implication/context Trump, is laboring under a double standard vis-a-vis the Democrats, by implication/context Clinton... which you refer to as "hypocrisy". As an aside you're mis-using/mis-applying the word "hypocrisy" and you do this a-lot.
Second, what you refer to as "several people mentioning the Clintons" is also misleading. In Post #5 @metalhead condemns charities named after rich people, which @rah responds to by invoking the Clintons, (which he later says was a joke), mh confirms that he includes Clinton in his rebuke and adds Gates, @Lexicus seconds that sentiment but adds that Trump is worse, which @Broken_Erika co-signs, then mh co-signs. Then @El_Machinae calls the mention of Clinton whataboutism and rah responds that he was joking in mentioning them. That's when you jumped in. So at the point where you entered in to condemn the supposed "hypocrisy" of people supposedly condemning Trump but not Clinton, mh, Lex, and Broken Erica had all already condemned Clinton, and rah had already said that his mention of Clinton was a joke in the first place. So there was no hypocrisy. Everyone has already acknowledged the Clinton corruption and concluded that Trump is worse, which brought us back to the topic of the thread. You can't blame your crusade to derail another thread into Clinton/Democrat whataboutism on "several people mentioning the Clintons before you did". The topic of the thread is Trump being charged for his corrupt/illegal activities.
In what way is "but Trump is worse" not whataboutism, then?
More than one person can be bad, mmmkay?