Obama to call for repeal of DADT in State of the Union

Defense Secretary Gates and JCoS Chairman Adm. Mullen were upbraided by Republicans for moving ahead with how to eliminate DADT, instead of further studying whether it should be done or not, as their Commander-in-Chief ordered them to do!

/meh. He ordered them to close Gitmo too didnt he? And you see how thats been going.

I think McCains main beef is doing it while we are in the middle of Iraq and Afghanistan. Its not exactly smart in engaging in a major change of military policy when you dont have much of an idea what the overall impact is going to be.
 
Its not exactly smart in engaging in a major change of military policy when you dont have much of an idea what the overall impact is going to be.
That's funny. I'd say it's not exactly smart engaging in even more obvious stalling tactics by the far-right and a minority of the armed forces. After all, the experts know all too well that it will have little or no implications, just as the adoption of the DADT policy in 1993 had no major effects, despite the dire warnings to the contrary from the far-right at the time.

Here is one such Republican expert.
 
That's funny. I'd say it's not exactly smart engaging in even more obvious stalling tactics by the far-right and a minority of the armed forces. After all, the experts know all too well that it will have little or no implications, just as the adoption of the DADT policy in 1993 had no major effects, despite the dire warnings to the contrary from the far-right at the time.

DADT did have some major effects. In fact, the thousands removed from service under DADT is a major talking point currently is it not?

I see you say a 'minority' of the armed forces....where did you get that information?
 
DADT did have some major effects. In fact, the thousands removed from service under DADT is a major talking point currently is it not?
So you have identified one major negative effect solved by repealing it. :goodjob:

Got any substantive downside to a repeal?
 
So you have identified one major negative effect solved by repealing it. :goodjob:

Got any substantive downside to a repeal?

Sure. Expected increase in sexual harassment/sexual assault cases. 'Course thats only bad news to the military in general, but good news for me since its just more job security.
 
Sure. Expected increase in sexual harassment/sexual assault cases.
So people who have been abiding by DADT will all of a sudden become predators? Are you more likely to sexually harrass or commit sexual assault because you can be open about your orientation?
 
So people who have been abiding by DADT will all of a sudden become predators?

Sexual harassment is often in the eyes of the victim. I am not saying they will be predatory, but the first time one makes a pass at someone who doest care for it, its going to be either a harassment or assault case waiting to happen.

Are you more likely to sexually harrass or commit sexual assault because you can be open about your orientation?

Yup, absolutely.
 
Sexual harassment is often in the eyes of the victim. I am not saying they will be predatory, but the first time one makes a pass at someone who doest care for it, its going to be either a harassment or assault case waiting to happen.
Doesn't that happen now when an unwise pass is made?
Yup, absolutely.
Nice confession.
 
Doesn't that happen now when an unwise pass is made?

Yup, but DADT curtails it pretty well for the homosexual population. Once DADT gets repealed, homosexuals will be just as free as heteros to commit harassment. :p

Nice confession.

Not a confession, just an acknowledgement of the reality of it all.
 
Yup, but DADT curtails it pretty well for the homosexual population. Once DADT gets repealed, homosexuals will be just as free as heteros to commit harassment.
So the common sense move would be to expand DADT to cover everyone, thus cutting down on hetero harrassment?
 
So the common sense move would be to expand DADT to cover everyone, thus cutting down on hetero harrassment?

Well, if you feel you can convice Obama about it go right ahead. But the easy fix isnt to make DADT cover everyone...its just dont allow women in the military....;)
 
How do you figure? :eek:

I am an open heterosexual - that makes me more likely to be a sexual predator? :confused:

I will try to explain this so you understand.
Moderator Action: Warned - trolling.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889

Heterosexuals are not restricted by a policy akin to DADT so they are free to openly express their sexuality in ways that the opposite sex sometimes finds harassing. As the saying goes, 'harassment is in the eye of the beholder', which can (and does) result in a pretty wide definition of what harassement is or is not.

Now, if you take the restrictions of DADT off the homosexual community, then they too are going to express their sexuality in ways previously disallowed.....and in doing so will assuredly garner a plethora of sexual harassment accusations in their own right.

I have seen people claim sexual harassment over the most stupid and minimal issues. And because the military (at least the Army) has a zero tolerance on such things, even the most innocent compliment can result in a harassment compliant and we are required to investigate it completely, because it has indeed been a valid problem in the military for a long period of time.

Does that explain my comment to you?

Psst or I'll rape you next.

Telling someone this at my workplace, even in jest, can get you discharged in a heartbeat. Thats how sensitive it is.
 
I'm at a loss as to how you can equate homosexuality, which is a sexuality not an opinion, with an opinion and a view that is not only judgemental, but is also bigoted and has the same logic as racists who look down upon other races.
Don't ask loaded questions, and I won't tell you you're using bogus debate tactics.
 
That actually makes sense MobBoss, I was initially under the impression that you were speaking in broad terms, as opposed to an army specific type thing, but with that tone in your voice I have no choice but to rape you too.

Moderator Action: Please don't threaten forum members
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889
 
Back
Top Bottom