Originally posted by Thunderfall
Who's King Brennus? Is he Viking's leader??
Originally posted by Melanic Sheep
Its probably just moved 1/3 of its movment for the turn.
Originally posted by animepornstar
ancient:
carthagians and celts
medieval:
spanish, viking, mongols and koreans
this must mean that is one industrial era civ and one modern era civ.
Originally posted by monkspider
The inca or maya are definitely in. The 8th civ has to be a middle-eastern civ, but who? Arabs, Turks, Isrealites, Ethiopians, Malians....
, seems to indicate Inca/Maya would not be in, since the Industrial and Modern Eras are not represented yet.Represented in four eras
Originally posted by kring
According to the E3 site: , seems to indicate Inca/Maya would not be in, since the Industrial and Modern Eras are not represented yet.
Originally posted by JBearIt
I think the "four eras" quote just refers to the fact that you play the game thru four eras not that there's at least one civ that started in each of the eras.
Originally posted by Carlos113
Monkspideryou are posting at Civfanatics and Apolyton at almost the same time.
Edit: this thread grows too fast!
Originally posted by kring
The Mongol shows 4.2.1/2. I don't think that's movement used. Since both are Mounted, Charge option is possible explanation. Consider the Sword button under Unit Orders.
Originally posted by monkspider
In regards to my fellow wichita copatriot, may I suggest a different inerpretation of that quote on the infogrames web site. Here is the exact quote
"Eight new Civilizations: Represented in four eras, each Civilization features new units for even more strategic depth."
I took it as meaning this: There are eight new civilizations in the game, and these eight new civs can play across the four entire eras of time (antiquity, middle ages, industrial age, modern age). Rather than there was nescarrily a civ representing each of the four ages (eg. America representing modern times, Germany representing industrial times, Babylon representing antiquity, etc).
While I don't rule out your interpretation, I at least feel that mine is reasonable as well. And interpretations be damned, we need another american civ.![]()
![]()
Actually, Genghis Khan had a quite majestic look, according to some historians.Originally posted by Genuis
but those screens of the new leaders look evil. I mean, I would expect Genghis Khan to look evil,
Originally posted by whb
My suspicions
Industrial civ: Austria (Marie Therese -- another female leader to the pot, and a very strong empire).
whb