pre-SKNES III: SKNES3_TITLE Missing Localization!

[Ophorian]

Interested in playing, I have no particular preference. I'll take whatever is available.

 

[Gem Hound]

Does New Granada work then? You're a dictatorship (well, absolute monarchy, but in this case it amounts to the same thing) and you have quite a few potential enemies around you.

Sure, I'll take it.

 

[JohannaK]

I haven't read the whole stuff, but I'm a Catalanfag, so you have something to work on there.

 

[SouthernKing]

Interested in playing, I have no particular preference. I'll take whatever is available.

I'll wait another 24 hours before deciding, but tentatively: I'd like New England and the Whaheydi Caliphate filled, and neither looks like it will have a player.

I haven't read the whole stuff, but I'm a Catalanfag, so you have something to work on there.

I guessed

Edit: I realized I had forgotten to mention this earlier, and it's probably important. The lists of monarchs on the front page are what I was able to collect from the timeline proper. If, by chance, you're playing a monarchy that doesn't have a list, then feel free to create monarchs to fill in the gap yourself. It's by no means necessary, but if you want to, go for it.

 

[Ophorian]

I await your decision eagerly.

 

[mythmonster2]

Well, I've thoroughly enjoyed the past two SKNESes, so why not hop in on this one? Only regret is I didn't see this sooner.

1: Confederacy of American States
2: Mysore
3: Korea
4: Sardinia
5: Whaheydi Caliphate (because my last attempt at a Muslim theocracy/monarchy went so well)

 

[Milarqui]

I've got a question: who owns Cuba and Puerto Rico? I'd say Spain, but I'm not 100% sure.

 

[SouthernKing]

I've got a question: who owns Cuba and Puerto Rico? I'd say Spain, but I'm not 100% sure.

Both are Spanish.

 

[Grandkhan]

Wait, if we're fixing up Borders, could I maybe do something with South America? Those random perfect arcs in New Granada especially don't make a lot of sense geographically.

 

[ChiefDesigner]

Both are Spanish.

Oh, wait, they are? Never mind.

1.) Louisiana
2.) Virginia
3.) Tejas
4.) Don't cast me, I'll wait to hop in as a Chinese rebel faction

 

[SouthernKing]

Wait, if we're fixing up Borders, could I maybe do something with South America? Those random perfect arcs in New Granada especially don't make a lot of sense geographically.

Yeah, of course.

Oh, wait, they are? Never mind.

Probably my fault for making Tejas's color too similar to Spain's.

 

[Ophorian]

Looking at the backgrounds, I think I'd have more fun and do more as New England, so I'd express preference for New England over the Whaheydi Caliphate. Though, as above, anywhere is /fine/.

 

[pole475]

You can choose whichever nation you want, unless you truly don't care which nation you receive.

 

[Nuka-sama]

Play the Caliph Ophoriannn

 

[pole475]

I'd go with New England, but your choice Ophorian

 

[Ophorian]

I suppose so.

1. New England
2. Whaheydi Caliphate.
3. Anywhere else.

 

[Neverwonagame3]

Russia was, frankly, GM problems. J.K Stockholme didn't tell us what warfare was meant to be like, so I assumes it was pretty much like modern- which meant resistance didn't stand a chance due to my superior numbers.

Since I had failed to achieve my goals, quitting was only logical. To do otherwise would be absurd.

 

[Ophorian]

Since I had failed to achieve my goals, quitting was only logical. To do otherwise would be absurd.

I don't think it's absurd at all, and I think it's silly to blame the GM. If you fail, roll with the punches and make new goals. Keep on going. Everyone fails at one point or another.

In any case, this is a thread for SKNES, I don't think there's any point in talking about other NESes here.

 

[Neverwonagame3]

I don't think it's absurd at all, and I think it's silly to blame the GM. If you fail, roll with the punches and make new goals. Keep on going. Everyone fails at one point or another.

In any case, this is a thread for SKNES, I don't think there's any point in talking about other NESes here.

Other people brought it up.

First, when playing a game a clear win/lose condition is a good thing. Since an NES does not set one, I set one myself. Otherwise, there is no way to know if I won or lost.

Second, that is contrary to how I operate and I was unaware anybody had a problem with it. I am still, after all, an Aspie- I like clear, concrete objectives. The flip side is that I cannot keep going once I have lost according to my set objectives. Whatever you say, the idea just feels ridicolous.

Third, in Russia's case I had set up the entire regime as fanatics. It would be quite absurd for them to withdraw. I hence was at a loss for how to write or play a country that, for whatever reason, was NOT the Russia I had been playing.

As for the G.M, he has recieved numerous complaints not just mine.

 

[Arrow Gamer]

I, and I'm fairly certain I speak for everyone else, implore you to take this to PM's or at the very least JK's thread.

Nobody wants your pointless bickering here.