RulerOfDaPeople
Emperor
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2007
- Messages
- 1,469
I'd like to see real legendary Amazon... 



If you go to the Amazon you'll see that the idea of unknown tribes is not that shocking. It's just too big and too difficult to travel through.
And throw stink bombs down at them?Just mind boggling. I now have a somewhat guilty desire to go on one of these flights.![]()
![]()
Doesn't it all just not seem real?
Very well said.It really depends on the nature of the "cult". If they're just out there, doing their thing, and not really "abusing" anyone, I'm all for the state leaving them be.
I'm generally very apprehensive over cult busting in the US. If there isn't widespread and heavy victimization going on, I really don't support the practice.
People should have a right to be left alone and live as they see fit, and to raise their children as they see fit. Western society isn't the end all be all to perspective and ways of living. Forced integration is an extremely disturbing concept. There need to be limits on what one can do, yes, but the point where the state intervenes needs to be very clearly laid out, and, imo, only in extreme cases of abuse and neglect where it is apparent that there is no sound logical reason that could justify that abuse and neglect.
Not to mention that Brazil does not have the systems in place to deal with properly integrating these people back into society, hell they don't even have the systems in place to properly integrate their own citizens into society - poverty and crime remain issues there, if I'm not mistaken. There's no reason to believe that they would be better off as Brazilian citizens.
Funai (the government's indian agency) tries desperately to keep the indians in their traditional lifestyle, as if it has any value in itself.
I don't know much about Funai but it sounds like perhaps these people would be better in "the stone age" with minimal contact. They are probably drawn in my curiosity & perhaps greed and then get caught in the system of welfare & dependency. Doesn't sound like a good situation. You obviously resent these people so why are you so opposed to them being allowed to keep their native lands.Right now there is a huge indian problem in Brazil. Nearly all indians have adopted a modern lifestyle, and yet they still have all sorts of priviledges under the law. I've been to many indian reservations and they all have sattelite dishes and go to evangelical churches. They are granted huge reservations for free (they are 0.2% of the population but own over 13% of the land), several kinds of government assistance, and are not accountable to Justice. Just last week an indian woman stabbed an engineer who was taking part in a debate and she cannot be persecuted. In Roraima, a northern state, the criminal federal government is creating a gigantic indian reservation, against the wishes of over 80% of the population of said state. This will make the area occupied by indian reserves in Roraima almost 60% of that state's area. Thousands of families are beign expelled from lands that they have occupied for two centuries to make way for a handful of indians that plan to exploit the region's vast diamond reserves.
The only solution is the abolition of all indian reservations, save the handful of the actually non-incorporated indians like the ones in the OP. All racist legal benefits must also be abolished, and Funai should stop trying to keep people in the stone age against their wishes.
Sounds like it certainly has!Don't know (racial income statitics are not as common in Brazil as in the US, and the few available are debatable). But I do know that there are gigantic differences in income among indian groups.
Some time ago, several children in an indian tribe in Goiás starved to death because their parents did not bother to work and the government assistance showed up late (I started a thread about it). Those guys are obviously very poor. I've been to a Guarani tribe in Paraná, some 3 years ago, and the indians there are essentially beggars, totally dependant on government aid and private donations (literally dozens of skinny kids surrounded my car and kept asking for money, a very sad scene). But in the North, where some tribes profit immensily from diamond and wood traficking, you have entire communities of millionaire indians who own imported cars and even private jets. One private jet owner a few years ago raped several kids and Justice let him walk because of his race, even though his indian status did not prevent him from traveling to Europe and the US several times.
It's a complex issue, but the only certainty is that the current policy failed in all fronts.
just a thought: Though the images are low-definition, it seems as though the men are painted red and the women black... but where are the children?
No culture should be artificially preserved, and this includes my culture and yours. Times change, habits change, languages change. It's as natural as the rainforest.Of course, other cultures have no value.
I don't oppose the lands for non-accultured indians. But there are virtually none of those. 99.9% of the indians (or more) have contact with the modern world and receive all sorts of assistance from the government, but they still are not criminally accountable and get huge pieces of land for free.I don't know much about Funai but it sounds like perhaps these people would be better in "the stone age" with minimal contact. They are probably drawn in my curiosity & perhaps greed and then get caught in the system of welfare & dependency. Doesn't sound like a good situation. You obviously resent these people so why are you so opposed to them being allowed to keep their native lands.
Again, my problem is that they are given that huge land even though they are not actually savages. They are inserted in brazilian society, and so if they want land they should buy it and pay the appropriate taxes just like the rest of us. Doing that I couldn't care less if they buy 13% or 60% of the entire land of the nation.Also, I had to shake my head a bit at your exclaimation that the natives owned 12% of the land. God forbid, right? Don't they realize the rainforest is property of the state?![]()
I agree with that but people shouldn't be lured away either.No culture should be artificially preserved, and this includes my culture and yours. Times change, habits change, languages change. It's as natural as the rainforest.
That does seem unjust. I would oppose it. Besides, as great as free-money and benefits sounds it can become somewhat of a curse.I don't oppose the lands for non-accultured indians. But there are virtually none of those. 99.9% of the indians (or more) have contact with the modern world and receive all sorts of assistance from the government, but they still are not criminally accountable and get huge pieces of land for free.
Fair enough.If they had remained in their "savage" state I would not oppose reservations at all, but I can't accept giving all sorts priviledges to brazilians just like me just because of their wide eyes and straight black hair.
You're use of the word savages makes meAgain, my problem is that they are given that huge land even though they are not actually savages.
Well, it depends if their ancestral homes even exist anymore. If they don't maybe they do deserve some compensation.They are inserted in brazilian society, and so if they want land they should buy it and pay the appropriate taxes just like the rest of us. Doing that I couldn't care less if they buy 13% or 60% of the entire land of the nation.
just a thought: Though the images are low-definition, it seems as though the men are painted red and the women black... but where are the children?