Prove God Exists - Act Three

Status
Not open for further replies.
erickcid said:
Well, God is Satan. Satan exists because morality adjusts as human beings evolve, therefore the man that is labelled as Evil by the Good and believes himself out of God's favor has something Divine to turn to for help. God understands humanity, which is why Satan is seen as a different being, in truth that is a Lie, which is rather funny when you think about it.. Anyway, the point here is Good people are not always Good despite their relative positions of authority throughout the years, hence the Divine need for Satan... I can go on here, but I am going to change gears to give you all something the think about. The Christmas Holiday - generally a time of Love and giving. Now Consider Jesus. Jesus = God = Love (as in God is Love, very popular saying). Love is attributed to the color Red. Santa = Satan (swap the letters) = Giving. The man in Red. Red attributed to passion/desire and evil. So God = Love = Red = Satan, and yes there are valid reasons for this deception, and yes fun is one of them. Red is the lowest of the (seven) colors, and it belongs to the (lowest) of the seven notes of the musical scale, which is C: and most (martial) music is in the key of C. I placed those words in () because they are of spirital significance Seven - a number of some note, commonly related to God, lowest = Satan = Hell = below = damn funny. Martial music.. remember when Heavy Metal was the devils music? Also, Red attributed to the God of War/martial, Mars, and as God says in the Bible, The Lord is a Man of War. Now the key of C.. Well C has many values for me, but here is the funny thing... the Key of C, C in this case standing for Creation. God is everywhere people.
[snip]
Oh my... I never imagined anything could get this ridiculous!
Even if there is a real connection between these things (which you choose to interpret in a very specific way), these are all cultural developement! These are all things that people associate through eachother, and incidentally, these same people are the ones who decided how to spell Santa and Satan, the same people who decided that both Santa and Satan are red, and that red hearts stand for love. These connections were created by the associations, not vice-versa!
Please cease with this folly!

FearlessLeader2 said:
What human have you ever heard of (that was not suffering from severe depression) who just crawled off into a corner to die when they got sick or badly injured? Self-preservation is not what I am talkinga bout. I am talking about the will to live. Animals give up their lives meekly when their injuries are beyond their ability to heal. No otherwise healthy human I have ever heard of has done the same. Death's onset shocks those of us who have not had the 'benefit' of psychological counsel to accept it. Think about that, of all the 'animals' on this planet, only man needs to be brainwashed to accept his own death, without that brainwashing, he denies it and fights it to the bitterest end.

No other creature in nature has our fear and disdain of death. To us, it is unnatural and alien, a thing to be abhorred above all others. We use it as our most ghastly punishment, we inflict it on those we hate, and we erect monuments to those that succumb to it and strive daily to stave it off.

And who among us do we revere the most? What professions are most noble and their practicioners obeyed nearly without question? Rescue workers and doctors, those who man the trenches against our millennias-old foe, Death. Who do we revile? Murderers and politicians, those who kill in person or by proxy. Who, among all others, do our emotions get confused and conflicted the most over? Soldiers and police, those who kill to protect citizens, or at the behest of politicians, to dominate them.


Predators routinely tear other animals limb from limb and consume them, often while still kicking. Herd animals abandon their elderly and sick. Hive insects fight wars of extermination against each other that make the Final Solution look like a walk in the park. Pack predators in action could be taped and shown as a perfect lesson in sadism and treachery. Parent predators training their young to hunt give the phrase 'playing with your food' a deeply disturbing meaning. So-called 'gentle' and 'almost-human' male great apes routinely establish pecking order in their troupes via rape, including homosexual rape.

Tell me again how man, that pitiful and inadequate poseur, stacks up against REAL animals...
I'll try not to get into this too much, but the differences between us and other ("simpler") animals are simple:
A large, developed brain.
Opposable thumbs.
Since you have never spoken with an animal (for I persume you do not claim to posess the wisdom of King Solomon) your claim that we see death differently than animals do is hollow.
The only reasons we do something about our wounds rather than lay back and cease to live, is that we have a big, well-developed brain, and opposable thumbs, that allow us to stop our bleeding, to kill infections, and to manipulate our bodies and delay death.
If cats were to suddenly become intelligent and capable of holding and creating tools, trust me, they would not let themselves die. Just like us, evolution has made them do whatever they can to survive.
Civilization has tamed us, but in nature, thousands of years ago, we were as brutal and relentless as any Heyena. Our developed brain makes us frown upon these actions because we would not want them to be done to us. Animals with simpler brains do not comprehend this concept.

PS:
I know these issues are prolly a bit behind you guys already, I'm just way behind on reading the thread so I'll post these while they're relatively fresh.
 
Blasphemous said:
Oh my... I never imagined anything could get this ridiculous!
Even if there is a real connection between these things (which you choose to interpret in a very specific way), these are all cultural developement! These are all things that people associate through eachother, and incidentally, these same people are the ones who decided how to spell Santa and Satan, the same people who decided that both Santa and Satan are red, and that red hearts stand for love. These connections were created by the associations, not vice-versa!
Please cease with this folly!

I bet erickcid would enjoy the word association thread!
 
Blasphemous said:
the same people who decided that both Santa and Satan are red, and that red hearts stand for love.
I have no words to tell you how happy I am! I now know(finally, after years of hard concentration in the desert) thanks to you great Blasphemous, that Satan stands for love(because red hearts stand for love, also!) :goodjob:

Therefore, God and Satan are the same person!(because we proved that Satan=Love and we KNOW that God=Love, also, so, God=Satan).
Now, if anyone wonders why our Lord pretends to be 2 different persons, that only psychologists can answer... :confused:
 
KA, do you realize that is exactly the (foolish) point that erickcid was trying to make? :blush:
 
I want everyone to look at the axoim Mr Gannon from our own forums came up with:

"Those who live by the sword, die by the sword." - Jesus

If that is the case then:

The Sword of God...

Which is wielded against sinners, by god:

Must lead to the conclusion:

That God is dead....

Incredible - What do you all think?
 
:rotfl:

Curt, you top yourself once again.

Since you used that...do I have permission to use the Onion's articles in a political debate?

EDIT: Curt, you forgot the last two steps, which may make it a little clearer to the rest that I havent had a sudden change of heart:

CURT WINS!!!!!!!!

[party]
 
cgannon64 said:
:rotfl:

Curt, you top yourself once again.

Since you used that...do I have permission to use the Onion's articles in a political debate?

You have the credit!
Don't be modest!

The brilliance is plain to see! :)
 
Plotinus said:
Show me where Jesus refers to "the sword of God" and I will be impressed.

Since religionists tell is that jesus was such a wise figure,
we can assume his words constitute a global meaning.

As in all swords, even those belonging to deities.
 
No, Curt, stop parodying your opponents. Some "religionists" believe that about Jesus. Not all. Not even all Christians believe that Jesus knew everything - in fact, it is probably heresy to say that he did, because such a belief would contradict the doctrine of Jesus' true humanity. Your argument would rely on showing that Jesus (a) believed that God possessed a sword of some kind, and (b) that his quoted words referred to that sword. What makes you think that Jesus ever endorsed (a)? Where, indeed, does the phrase come from in the first place? Do you know?
 
Then I am guilty of heresy! - I await the inquistors of Toledo to arrive at my door!

It is not up to me to prove the words of jesus, I reckon he never existed at all.

But I thought the idea of the 'a god dies by his own sword' concept might be interesting...
 
CurtSibling said:
I want everyone to look at the axoim Mr Gannon from our own forums came up with:

"Those who live by the sword, die by the sword." - Jesus

If that is the case then:

The Sword of God...

Which is wielded against sinners, by god:

Must lead to the conclusion:

That God is dead....

Incredible - What do you all think?
Brilliant!!! Mr. Gannon exceeded even Nitzche himself!!! :goodjob:
 
CurtSibling said:
It is not up to me to prove the words of jesus, I reckon he never existed at all.

There's no doubt whatsoever that Jesus existed. Whether he was who Christians believe he was, that's another matter. There was a brief period in the 1920s when some scholars argued that Jesus was completely made up, but it didn't last long.

The main way you can tell this is by seeing how the traditions about Jesus have been altered in the New Testament. The fact that Christians were evidently embarrassed by some things that Jesus did or said and tried to tone them down or explain them away in the Gospels and elsewhere indicates that they didn't make them up in the first place.
 
CurtSibling said:
"Those who live by the sword, die by the sword." - Jesus

It is merely an expression. Surely even Jesus could use figurative language?
 
@Plotinus:
All it proves is that subsequent generations of church-leaders changed the rules to suit themselves.

I reckon jesus did not exist though. At least the figure people speak of.
 
OK, I should comment on the joke I made that suddenly turned serious:

God doesn't have a sword. This debate is moot.

ALTHOUGH, a good debate does lie under here. God does seem belligerent in the Old Testament, which is the origin of the "Sword of God" symbolism.

The only thing my little axiom proved was that Christians and Jews have different views of God, nothing else.
 
They didn't *change* the rules - there *weren't* any rules to start with. That is just the kind of thing people in the ancient world did.

In fact, I think that most experts today tend to think that the early Christians were relatively conservative when it came to changing the traditions about Jesus. They tended to mould what they had rather than make up completely new stuff (apart from John, of course). If that weren't so then it wouldn't be so easy to see the tensions between the traditions they inherited and their own views. For example, Mark 13:2 had Jesus say that the Temple would be destroyed and every stone cast down. In fact, although the Temple was destroyed, many stones remained standing, and still are - that's what the Wailing Wall is. So that shows that it's very unlikely that any Christian made up that saying, because it did not come true, and that means it is very likely that Jesus said it. In general, we do actually know quite a lot about the historical Jesus. The picture in the Synoptics is, on the whole, a good impression of what Jesus was probably really like, even though the material has been altered. The situation is very like Socrates. No-one thinks that Socrates said everything that Plato attributes to him, but we can still know a fair bit about what Socrates was like and some of the things he believed.
 
cgannon64 said:
OK, I should comment on the joke I made that suddenly turned serious:

God doesn't have a sword. This debate is moot.

ALTHOUGH, a good debate does lie under here. God does seem belligerent in the Old Testament, which is the origin of the "Sword of God" symbolism.

The only thing my little axiom proved was that Christians and Jews have different views of God, nothing else.

I never said it was serious afterwards! :D
But I agree, there is good discussion material therein!
 
If I may, I would like to quote a great movie line:

"Without evil, there can be no good, so it must be good to be evil sometimes."
-Satan, The South Park Movie.
Originally Posted by erickcid: Well, God is Satan.
Honestly, I dont see why people feel the need to differentiate between Satan and God. God burns down cities and kills their inhabitants for being immoral. He strikes good people with plagues and tragedy to make them prove their faith. Satan lures people into immorality so God can kill them and burn their cities. You ask me, they seem like a pretty good team.
 
I just thought of something that I remember from a computer game "Shadow Hearts", it said that calling something a god was a matter of perspective, if you think of an ant, it would see us humans as gods as we are so much larger and impressive than it is. therefore a god could just have been something that was seen to be much larger, or greater and more impressive to us humans at the time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom