Questions for our European members

The bases are, as has been said, of lesser importance now than 15 years ago. However, they do provide the capability to forward deploy air assets to Ramstein, or various RAF bases, and also to provide logistics hubs and hospital facilities. Particularly significant is that it allows the potential forward deployment of tankers for refueling purposes, extending the global reach of airpower and the bomber force.
For the forseeable future until the entry into service of a hypersonic aircraft that can hit any target in the world from the CONUS in a few hours, they provide a useful service, and an insurance policy in case Ivan changes his stripes.
 
Edited.



Delete this post. :scan: :scan:
 
Let's say I posted something. And then I thought about it. And then I came to the conclusion, that it wouldn't be worth it. And edited my post.
 
Originally posted by Yago
Let's say I posted something. And then I thought about it. And then I came to the conclusion, that it wouldn't be worth it. And edited my post.

O, sorry pal. I thought you were saying to close the thread ;)

Anyway, i have more questions after reading this:

Why is English less spoken in the Southern regions?
Which nations have the highest standards of living?
 
Originally posted by archer_007


O, sorry pal. I thought you were saying to close the thread ;)

Anyway, i have more questions after reading this:

Why is English less spoken in the Southern regions?
Which nations have the highest standards of living?

1. in the south the origin of the languages is different: Spanish, Italian, French and Portuguese are all derived from Latin. German, Dutch and English come from Germanic languages. I didn't even mention Greek yet, which is a structure on it's own again. Latin languages have a different structure than Germanic languages, which complicates things. On top of that, education was always on a higher level in the 'Germanic' countries (and France) in the past century, and it still is, eventhough there is a lot of catching up. Maybe there is some pride and nationalism involved too (why should we learn their language? stuff like that)

2. I have no idea, but I'm guessing one of the Scandinavian countries, closely followed by the Netherlands. There was a UN report on this just a few months ago, and the Netherlands came out as #4 worldwide, but I think we at least had one or two Scandinavian countries above us.
 
Language barrier ?

The romanic-language barrier is actually way higher then for the germanic languages to learn English. My english manly consists out of making phrases in Swiss-German, slightly change the words from Swissgerman sounding to English sounding and leave the Swissgerman grammar 100% intact. The result will not be the perfect Queen's English, but I think it's enough to be understood. My general obsveration is, that the latin-speakers are pretty fast in learning other latin-languages, while the germanic-speakers learn other germanic languages pretty fast. This means, that latin-speakers will converse more easily among eachother by using a latin-language.

Standard of living ?

landlocked, majestically scenic country, the Swiss Confederation's long-standing neutral status has given it political stability that has helped it become one of the world's wealthiest countries.
says the BBC.

The richest country of Europe is Luxembourg, followed by San Marino and Iceland.
 
Originally posted by willemvanoranje
2. I have no idea, but I'm guessing one of the Scandinavian countries, closely followed by the Netherlands. There was a UN report on this just a few months ago, and the Netherlands came out as #4 worldwide, but I think we at least had one or two Scandinavian countries above us.
We were high on the list, but we've dropped far.:(
 
Originally posted by Hamlet


Why?

If France and Germany ever decided to forget the EU and form their own Franco-German Union, theyd become an instant superpower. Seems far fetched right now, but it wouldnt seem that unlikely if France and Germany both took a turn to the right within the next 20 years. I know, at the moment its a complete fantasy, but the potential is there. The EU is really a French and German project. They are the ones who set the agenda. I can forsee several scenarios where France and Germany get tired of being vetoed by Britain and some of the smaller states and decide to strike out on their own. We got a glimpse of this during the debate about the Iraq war when the French basically told the newer eastern EU members/candidates to basically sit down and shut up.
 
Originally posted by Dumb pothead


If France and Germany ever decided to forget the EU and form their own Franco-German Union, theyd become an instant superpower. Seems far fetched right now, but it wouldnt seem that unlikely if France and Germany both took a turn to the right within the next 20 years. I know, at the moment its a complete fantasy, but the potential is there. The EU is really a French and German project. They are the ones who set the agenda. I can forsee several scenarios where France and Germany get tired of being vetoed by Britain and some of the smaller states and decide to strike out on their own. We got a glimpse of this during the debate about the Iraq war when the French basically told the newer eastern EU members/candidates to basically sit down and shut up.

I doubt such a grouping would ever be nessacity, as the other nations will fall in line due to the economic benifits.
 
Originally posted by archer_007


I doubt such a grouping would ever be nessacity, as the other nations will fall in line due to the economic benifits.

The economic benefits are more in doubt every day. Mainly because Germany and France are not living up to the economic requirements that they themselves pushed through. Not being a European, I could very well be talking complete gibberish, but the smaller EU countries may one day begin to fear more the tyrants 5 miles away than the one 5000 miles away (I mean kilometers).
 
Originally posted by Dumb pothead


If France and Germany ever decided to forget the EU and form their own Franco-German Union, theyd become an instant superpower. Seems far fetched right now, but it wouldnt seem that unlikely if France and Germany both took a turn to the right within the next 20 years. I know, at the moment its a complete fantasy, but the potential is there. The EU is really a French and German project. They are the ones who set the agenda. I can forsee several scenarios where France and Germany get tired of being vetoed by Britain and some of the smaller states and decide to strike out on their own. We got a glimpse of this during the debate about the Iraq war when the French basically told the newer eastern EU members/candidates to basically sit down and shut up.
I disagree, sir.

If (and only if) there'd by a "turn to the right" in either France and Germany, you would expect that such governments would try to get out of the EU ASAP, respectively they would not have any interest in forming some sort of French-German union. In Germany, extreme right wing groups are known to be dumb anyways (they have no "real life" policy). The very few candidates from the extreme right that made it from time to time into parliament used to drop out after one period of legislature, because these candidates were usually simply swamped with daily needs of parliamentary work. Thus, even none of the former voters care a sh*t for them again. So I wouldn't expect such scenario happening in the next 20 years over here.

Also, as I understand French right wingers, I think they wouldn't *unite* w/ Germany. Generally, if anything like that happens, I'd think both countries relations would get worse.
That the EU was invented or pushed by France & Germany doesn't mean that F and G would want to try to dominate Europe. And any formation of different blocks or axis with contrary agendas towards each other, is just the thing that the EU wants to avoid. From a historical point of view, such blocks have brought a lot of harm to Europe. Me thinks that Adenauer and De Gaulle had exactly this on mind when they started their first efforts on forming some kind of European cooperation after ww2.

Furthermore, "smaller" EU members do not regard this institution as "F/G conspiracy" to gain control over them, plus a lot of newly founded countries in Eastern Europe even want to get a membership.
And I don't think they're blind.:)
 
Originally posted by Grille

Also, as I understand French right wingers, I think they wouldn't *unite* w/ Germany. Generally, if anything like that happens, I'd think both countries relations would get worse.

I was thinking about that, but I see it as a marriage of convenience to achieve certain goals rather than a marriage of love. Also, Im not saying they would join into one nation, but more like a federation which is what they would like to see the EU become.
However, far be it from me to argue with a man about what goes on in his own home...I'll take your word for it, but Id sure like to hear what people from some of those "smaller" European states think about my verruckt ideas:)
 
about the economics: that's just temporary. It's conjuncture. Nothing else. In 2-3 years we have giantic growths again, and after that we'll get in a situation like now again, and then huge growth again....
 
but Id sure like to hear what people from some of those "smaller" European states think about my verruckt ideas

They are very crazy.

Seems far fetched right now, but it wouldnt seem that unlikely if France and Germany both took a turn to the right within the next 20 years. I know, at the moment its a complete fantasy, but the potential is there.

I'd rather expect another country turn complete fundamentalist and whacko which is not on the European continent. But that sounds more like the stereotype from the stereotype post -> Ocotber, Germany is re-united. November -> Germany invades Poland.


The EU is really a French and German project. They are the ones who set the agenda. I can forsee several scenarios where France and Germany get tired of being vetoed by Britain and some of the smaller states and decide to strike out on their own. We got a glimpse of this during the debate about the Iraq war when the French basically told the newer eastern EU members/candidates to basically sit down and shut up

I would say that analysis does not live up to reality. It's mainly a project of France, the low-lands and Germany. Including now Spain, Italy and Greece, which are not as small and meaningless, as many Americans seem to think they are. (Italy is a ****ing booming, strong economy, beware the lombards !).

I rather see that the UK keep their distance to the continent. Which I'd like to see. The Brits can't make up their mind.
 
Back
Top Bottom