Questions for our European members

If you like it or not, English will become the official secondary language (after your mother tongue). Most people speak English now.

I do not think so. It's now my third language. And I agree, it possibly will be the third language generally, but not the second for most. As I said, before, germanic-speakers will propably take it as second. By the way, the other contenter for third lanuage is Spanish, I think. People who work in administration, usually are polyglott anyway. And a big part of them speaks 3, 4 or 5 languages.
 
Trying to impose any language as more official than others would be the end of EU. No one would accept it.
 
Originally posted by archer_007
Question i felt like this would be the best place to ask:
What is the point/function of the European Parliament?
I know they have some power, although I think it is mostly what on would define as 'soft' power. The way I percieve it they a) help in exposing corruption in the commision and among the member states, although thay can't do much about it at present b) the individual members of parliament act as the connection between the average voter and the EU. That is they often seek to spark debates about current issues. Since they don't have to toe the national line or dance to the tune of the commision they are worth listening to. So they act as the conscience of the EU.

When do you see, if you see it at all, Europe intergrated into one state?
I think that in the area of trade, monetary policy, external tarifs, aerospace and agricultural and energy policy Europe is highly integrated. In fact in terms of energy policy I would say it is most integrated region in the world, even more than the US. In areas of immigration, environment, taxation and education Europe is only partially integrated - the problem here seems that some countries like Denmark and the UK want a free ride. That is mainly because they are not as socially advanced as the rest of the EU.
When it comes to defence and foreign policy Europe is not very integrated. The defence conglomerates are integrated, but only France, Germany and the Benelux countries seem interested in creating an European Army. Actually the creation of an independent European defence force is something I think should not recieve a very high priority. In terms of foreign policy Europe is split, however that is because many pro-war governments didn't have the courage to listen to the people.


What do you see being the primary language?
I don't see anything wrong with using English as a common language. however it is important that people who feel uncomfortable using the English language should still be able to communicate so the current policy of providing each language with an official equal status is a sound one.


How widespread is the English language in European nations?
It is widespread among the young and well educated. I can see that there is a problem with the large number of people who are not able to understand English, since they will feel left out and perhaps feel spiteful towards European integration for that reason.

Would you prefer being ruled from Brussels (or any other site that could be chosen) or by your current government?
Depends on who is ruling your own country doesn't it? I would say that presently I am fairly satisfied that the EU is working for the good of common humanity - especially when I compare with the government in my own country and some other countries as well.


Do you see the US as a threat to European intergration?
Not really. Although the current administration in Washington is making a fuss about anti-americanism in Europe I believe that perception will disappear after a while. Perhaps in 2004. I don't really believe that their policy of inducing fear is something that will bring Europe together. It is up to the Europeans themselves, to decide what they want.
I can see some potential trouble on the horizon if the economy takes a further plunge in the US and the administration wants to divert attention away from it.
In any case I think the European central bank and the commision needs to introduce some control on the expansion of the Euro monetary bloc. Specifically some checks will have to be imposed so as not to allow oil producing countries to provoke intervention by recieving their payments for oil in Euros in stead of as presently US dollars. At the same time the US central bank needs to be a bit more responsible when it comes to expanding the money supply, if they want to keep OPEC in line.
At the same time both the US and Europe must make sure that free trade is further institutionalized so as not allow for sudden off-the-head by fiat trade barriers. I also think that the European public needs more information on what are the potential, if any, dangers og GM foods. The idea of opening the market to such produce, while at the same time putting warning stamps on it is problably the best avenue for the time being, but there needs to be some closure on the subject.
 
about the european army: theoretically it's a good idea. What use is it for a country like Belgium to have a navy, airforce & land-army? With the budget we have, it allows for a couple of minehunters & some outdated F-16's & Leopard tanks.

A country with a military budget as small as ours can't afford to have all 3 componants & at the same time have a competitive & up to date army. It would be better if the hole budget would be spend on a state of the art tank/marine division of 30.000 men in Belgium & for instance, let the netherlands focus on the navy....

The problem of course with such an integrated army would be that the foreign politics of the different nations would have to have the same convictions & ideas...
 
The main reason I don't want an integrated European Army is that there is always the danger that it will be used for some colonial adventure - what the technocrats call out-of-area operations. If peace is to achieved somewhere in the world each individual European country can contribute to the UN.

I can see how a division of labour will cheapen the expenses of a total defence solution for Europe. France provides the nukes, the transport planes and the hightech stuff. Germans provide the manpower. The smaller countires provide whatever they are good at. The British will keep a bit of everything to just in case.

It should still be exclusively a defence force. A deterrent. I don't want the Russians to think they should rearm too, or the Americans to say 'well now you can handle yourselves, goodbye.'
 
1. Point? Hmm...
2. Probobly but i hope not
3. English I think, but I do not think that any nation(integrated in EU or not) will give up their native language..
4. Pretty much.. Especcially in West-Europe
5. NO
6. Only Mc. Donalds
 
Originally posted by archer_007
What is the point/function of the European Parliament?

For evil contintental types to create a world super power.

Originally posted by archer_007
When do you see, if you see it at all, Europe intergrated into one state?

Never!

Originally posted by archer_007
What do you see being the primary language?

There could never be one.

Originally posted by archer_007
Would you prefer being ruled from Brussels (or any other site that could be chosen) or by your current government?

Both are foreign...

Originally posted by archer_007
Do you see the US as a threat to European intergration?

No.
 
the problem here seems that some countries like Denmark and the UK want a free ride. That is mainly because they are not as socially advanced as the rest of the EU.

not as socially advanced, what the hell is that supposed to mean :confused:
 
Originally posted by emu


not as socially advanced, what the hell is that supposed to mean :confused:

1)Denmark is a monarchy.

2)Still has colonies: Greenland and the Faroe countries, which by the way are treated very badly. One often used devise is to create artificial economic crisis in order that they send workers and fishermen to the 'mothercountry'.

3)The government coalition rests on an openly racist party, which continually spews out bile and hatred at the muslims

4)The socio-economic structure is fascist since,
a)The maersk conglomerate, which controls the trade fleet, the north sea oil, controlling shares in the largest bank, controlling shares in the largest supermarket-chain have indiscriminate acces to the prime minister.
b)the police is corrupt, too busy deleting eachothers parking tickets, they have handed over control of the criminal underground to neo-nazis and moter bike gangs, they in turn control and punish the weaker criminals or anyone who gets in their way
c)Up to the war they allowed for establishment of countless hashis establishments, so as to weaken young peoples opposition to the war in typical psy ops fashion
d)The newspapers are controlled by government agents
f)the cab drivers are secret police
g)The educational and scientific system is penetrated by fascist sentiment. Just yesterday a professor started, what seems like a well prepared debate, to demand that people with lesser intelligence should have fewer children while financially rewaerding intelligent people to beget more children.

Hence I don't think Denmark is very socially advanced.
 
Originally posted by archer_007

1. What is the point/function of the European Parliament?
2. When do you see, if you see it at all, Europe intergrated into one state?
3. What do you see being the primary language?
4. How widespread is the English language in European nations?
5. Would you prefer being ruled from Brussels (or any other site that could be chosen) or by your current government?
6. Do you see the US as a threat to European intergration?

1. Who knows what they are doing... :crazyeye:
2. 50 years from now.
3. English
4. Quite, they are teaching it in every school now, so even if you don't know it that well, you still know something.
5. Current Government please.
6. NO.
 
Doktor u said they werent as socially advanced, so why isnt the UK socially advanced?
 
Originally posted by emu
Doktor u said they werent as socially advanced, so why isnt the UK socially advanced?

I don't know. Maybe you can yell me. You live there.
Off the top of my head I think of hooligans, and the monarchy of course.
 
Originally posted by Dr. Dr. Doktor
I don't know. Maybe you can yell me. You live there.
Off the top of my head I think of hooligans, and the monarchy of course.

:lol:

(You're not actually serious, are you? Got to ask)
 
Originally posted by Smaasnekje
Whats wrong with a Constitutional Monarchy? (You know that the regent has no REAL power right?)

Go out into the street and burn an effigy of your monarch and you will feel his real power.:satan:
 
Originally posted by phoenix_night
@Dr. Dr. Doktor,
Now you have to answer my question, because now I'm not so sure...
:crazyeye:

I am being a bit satirical I guess. But there is a kernel of truth in it somewhere.
 
1. What is the point/function of the European Parliament?
2. When do you see, if you see it at all, Europe intergrated into one state?
3. What do you see being the primary language?
4. How widespread is the English language in European nations?
5. Would you prefer being ruled from Brussels (or any other site that could be chosen) or by your current government?
6. Do you see the US as a threat to European intergration?

1. To be honest, I have no idea. I wasn't aware that it did anything...
2. I don't think Europe will ever unite into one state. The cultures are too different, and the people are too stubborn :mischief:
3. I don't believe there will ever be a state, but if tehre was then English.
4. It's pretty widespread in the UK ;)
5. London, its the biggest city in Europe. Even though it is illogical...
6. Quite the opposite.

Off the top of my head I think of hooligans

The hooligans are from England, in Scotland we have neds :D
 
Back
Top Bottom