Do you still find this combination to be a pleasing and balanced setting?
Wow, you did some digging in my past
I do, but I am afraid that my opinion is barely relevant because I have very limited time to play and (therefore) I do not have much experience with any other settings.
I like the epic feeling of building the empire, fighting protracted just wars of attrition (= I rarely declare myself, but still end up conquering half of the world). I like a little bit of challenge, but I roleplay a bit. I often leave just the Dom victory on and I do not play to achieve any victory conditions.
It usually means that I lose interest in the current game in the Atomic or Info era, when things start to take too much time and/or I face no real competition.
So yes, I find my settings pleasing, I do not find any glaring disbalance (such as 1 civ shooting ahead by 10 techs in classical), but my requirements may be different from other players and I do not have much experience with other settings (I only alter the maps). Last time I checked, standard was too quick and my units obsoleted too quickly to enjoy the new weapon arriving to the battle and I did not feel any accomplishment when finishing a wonder and marathon was too slow for me. I like exploring the map and meeting many civs and fielding big armies, so smaller maps with not enough land are a no-no for me.
I will soon post in the other thread where we were discussing the game performance and CTDs in later eras. My current game with the above settings is proceeding flawlessly and I am in the Atomic era.