Can someone explain to me why these
are thought to be a good idea when you can have these instead?
I'm not talking about the actual design on the head, I'm talking about the fact that one is stuck at a fixed height on the wall while the other, through the clever use of a hose, has a much wider range.
I really don't understand how you can think it's a good idea to have your shower head attached to the wall and unable to move.
First, more often than not, my head is ABOVE said shower head, making for incredibly awkward moments when I need to wash my hair and face. I have to squat but just so, or bend over backwards, and it's incredibly annoying.
Second, it makes washing body parts that are at ground level (read: feet) needlessly more complicated. The water pressure at floor level is non existent, and the water has been so dispersed in the air it's like trying to wash in a mist. Trying to get your feet at a level where the water is still pressured enough to actually clean stuff and remove the soap requires even more awkward gymnastics.
Third, by the time the water reaches the ground, it's a good few degrees colder.
Now let's look at the second design. Because you have a hose, you can freely move the head around. Like, for instance, ABOVE your head! Or DOWN on your feet! No gymnastics, no misty pressure, no changes in temperature! And the best part? You can still attach the head on the wall if you want too!

I know, it's incredible.
And yet, 100% (Seriously... I mean it, 100%) of the showers I've had in the US have been with type A shower heads. In my previous place I went and bought a type B, and it's one of the first thing I'm gonna change in my new place.
So, a couple of questions:
- Do you actually think type A shower heads are better, and why?
- Do you know why type B shower heads are not equipping 100% of the showers?