It is, but it's up to you to enforce it.Feels like it should be illegal to do that, since you paid for a specific service delivered in a specific way.
Whence cometh the full story?
Unfortunately my ability to enforce the law on Jeff Bezos is limited.It is, but it's up to you to enforce it.
There are groups considering suing in Germany, since it's essentially a hidden increase in price, which requires that you agree to it. I would think this has a chance of being succesful.Amazon has instated its new ads addition to Prime Video. I'm not pleased that they're introducing this to annual plans that are already paid for. Feels like it should be illegal to do that, since you paid for a specific service delivered in a specific way. But the price is $3/mo and Prime itself is $10/mo if you aren't doing annual, in which case it drops to $99/yr. I can't be that mad about it, since I also make use of the free, faster shipping and the free Twitch subscription + MTX drops.
But I can see why Americans would be upset. Americans, after currency conversion, pay $20/mo for Amazon Prime. And are now also paying for no ads. That's getting pretty steep. Prime + no ads is $9.64 USD/mo for Canadians.
Do you believe in rebirth...?You know how sometimes you can fix electronic or computer problems by turning it off and on again, or unplugging it and plugging it back in? What if physical health problems worked like that too, would that be cool, like I could turn a switch on my neck and I system reboot and suddenly whatever problem I had is gone
We pay $139 a year for prime. That has now gone up by $2.99/month ($36 per year) to not see ads. It may not be worth it. We have to see how much we save on shipping stuff.But I can see why Americans would be upset. Americans, after currency conversion, pay $20/mo for Amazon Prime. And are now also paying for no ads.
It is an inherent problem with the civil legal system. Except for exceptional circumstances it is a public service that provides a way to get what you want that is only available to the rich.Unfortunately my ability to enforce the law on Jeff Bezos is limited.
I sued a HDD manufacturer when a new drive crashed and I lost all my data. They paid me $3000. Now, it was in small claims court in NM and they never showed up to respond, so I won. This was 20 or so years ago. It cost me about $100 to file my case.It is an inherent problem with the civil legal system. Except for exceptional circumstances it is a public service that provides a way to get what you want that is only available to the rich.
Was it a Fujitsu?I sued a HDD manufacturer when a new drive crashed and I lost all my data. They paid me $3000. Now, it was in small claims court in NM and they never showed up to respond, so I won. This was 20 or so years ago. It cost me about $100 to file my case.
No, IIRC it was MaxtorWas it a Fujitsu?
Just wondering 'cause i remember when Fujitsu made a large number of drives using a shipment of defective control chips or something. At least i think it was Fujitsu. Back around the early-mid 2000's.No, IIRC it was Maxtor
That would also flush your recent memory though, and wouldn't fix systemic issues like a joint weakness or liver complaint. (Cool idea, though!)
Do you believe in rebirth...?
I know! The man's entire business strategy is to use other people's money and other people's unpaid work to drive other people out of business and as such keep increasing sales in order to get more of other people's money in the form of stock sales and other funding and so he's very much running a planetary Ponzi scheme.Unfortunately my ability to enforce the law on Jeff Bezos is limited.
Keep in mind that anyone who uses CCs, mortgages or other debt financing is using "other peoples' money". In addition, if improved sales or other financial data increases the stock prices such that people buy more Amazon stock, those stock purchases are for stock currently owned by people and not the company. Market transactions do not add to the cash that Amazon holds. If you or I buy 1000 shares of Amazon today, the money goes to some anonymous seller who pockets the money. Monopoly issues aside, how is Amazon a Ponzi scheme?I know! The man's entire business strategy is to use other people's money and other people's unpaid work to drive other people out of business and as such keep increasing sales in order to get more of other people's money in the form of stock sales and other funding and so he's very much running a planetary Ponzi scheme.