WAIT WAIT WAIT! I can understand how i would be a suspect, but at this point isnt EVERYBODY a suspect? Innocent until proven guilty, and guilty until proven innocent. Any investigations/thoughts should follow this rule. Dont rule anyone out until the true suspect if found, in which case you rule everybody else out. Ilduce you are not excepted from this just because you are VP. Even Whosit is a suspect at this point. ON THE POINT OF OPPOSITION LEADER- Why is Ravus listed as the opposition leader on the front page? MN and myself already agreed via PM that if we were both part of the opposition, then I would become the opposition leader. Just because Ravus declaree his desire for the post at the last minute doesnt cancel out that agreement in my mind. I will forward the messgaes to whoever wants them/post them here if requested. Some parts of the PM might be edited out if i post them on here though, since i forget what information exactly i included in them. I still wish for this post, as i think Ravus (as a monk) is unfit (sorry Ravus but thats my train of thought) to be opposition leader since he is a monk and too peaceful. In my opinion, just because the opposition outnumber the adminstartion for the first time in english history doesnt mean a peaceful opposition leader should be elected. You might point to Ravus's administration as proof that cooperation bewteen a president and a peaceful opposition leader works. But we are not in that situation. We are at war, and i consider this adminstartion to be suspect at best, and i wish to be able to keep it on its toes. I think we need an opposition leader that will push, and keep pushing. One that will keep the administration not on its toes, but suspended in midair waiting to react. Some people have even suggested EP and ML. Well i have one question to ask of you: If it was innopropiate to give me during my presidency either of those powers like i had suggested to institute a draft to help fight the romans and stop the opposition from interfering, then why is it needed only a dfew turns afterwards? I understand that we have lost an important city, but we still have a somehwat decent army, much the same that we had when i asked for them. AND we have hurt their army. We dont know exact numbers, but predictions by military theorists have estimated very high percentages of their army out of action. As much as 90% in radical numbers, only as low as 50%. and the average, and most accepted, percentage is about 80% of their army either destroyed or severly damaged. Due to the low activity of JMUG (he gets on, but not enough to really keep up with everything and handle a party full time) i have decided to assume PRIMARY leadership of my party so as to make decisions at a split seconds notice without fear of JMUG not liking it. I will make decisions, then if JMUG disaproves he will PM ME about it and i will most likely change it, or explain my reasons for it then still most likley chage it if he still disagrees. He is still a co-founder, but i have just assumed primary leadership so as to resolve the duel leadership crisis that Ravus has pointed out. As an official statement, FaS officially wishes to refrain from any signing of the charter for emergency powers, and even wishes other parties to boycott it and refrain from signing. I do not think EP is nessacery at this time. Maybe in the future if the home isles or Iberia are directly threatened. We DO ask for a military draft in cities threatened by the romans at this time, where military forces stationed in the area will train militia (archers/axemen with no promotions) who volunteer from the populace and will disband at the end of the crisi and rejoin the population. WIM- The convert the CIVs to our religion. Mech-I support this notion, although maybe it should be a galley loaded with a scout once the war is over. Iceland, the arctic, baltic, and scandinavia should all be fully explored as well by our existing naval forces after the war. I play vanilla warlords.