Realpolitik CIV - An Interactive AAR

Status
Not open for further replies.
White came from the fact that our in game flag is red and white. My coalition is the PATRIOTS after all.

Yes i think your right, yekaterinburg would be better now. But i dont think we should just ignore their capital or Orenburg. Right now the two holy cities and yaroslavl are my main goals. Let us pray we can take even that with our limited force.
 
I felt like this game was getting slightly dull without speeches so im trying to bring them back. And i thought this might encourage you to implement some form of NPC voting to this one, even if its not on such a large scale as RP2.

Did you enjoy the speech though? I thought it was pretty bad. Just not in a speech writing mood.
 
I felt like this game was getting slightly dull without speeches so im trying to bring them back. And i thought this might encourage you to implement some form of NPC voting to this one, even if its not on such a large scale as RP2.

Did you enjoy the speech though? I thought it was pretty bad. Just not in a speech writing mood.

I'm not making any more major changes to this one.;)

It was interesting.

LH is on chat!

-L
 
I think we should keep NPCs out of this one, some people (AHEM) like these rules better after experiance with the Beta, or even without that. I also have to say to Arya: Rep, SoL, levees, SP Watermills, and Biology can make Tundra acceptable in Civ4. I've done it before, and the land may not all be tundra (E18 doesn't put it like that). I think a few Screenshots of what the land is like would be nice before deciding to expand there (but I can't ask for them, Perhaps Aysee or whoever becomes Prez next can?)

DT
Divine Manifest of Siberian Britain :jesus:
 
I think NPC parties and votes are an awesome idea. I'm drawing up some new and some (IMO) improved rules for the realpolitik i might make some day, and those are definitely on there.
 
Whosit? Yes he has been a great president in the past. He has had several terms of success. But they have also had several failures. Bad precedents, among other things. I wish them luck, and hope if they get elected, they will do what they think is best for our nation.

(OK, let's do speeches. :p)

I challenge representative Arya on these vague allegations. To what "failures" and "bad precedents" do you refer? I can certainly tell you what successes I have had! I rallied our forces when England's future seemed darkest and drove the Roman Legions from Ravus-York to Rome's doorstep! I secured Rome's surrender and annexation, and through negotiation averted war with the Vikings! In my second term, I secured England's rightful place as leader of the world's nations, bringing us untold prosperity and security, and guided our people through Golden Age after Golden Age! Always under my rule has England flourished!

Now, representative Arya is certainly capable, and his plans are sound, if not exceptional. But doesn't England deserve the exceptional? That spark of brilliance that only few can provide? Why settle for competent when you can choose Excellence? People of England, and Members of Parliament, give your support to the party that has led England from ruled to ruler; pledge your votes to the candidate who has time and again proven his honor, courage, and capability. Vote for the Holy Britannian Alliance! Vote for Whosit! With my leadership, England will become unrivaled among nations of the world, and I shall secure our nation's everlasting peace!

All hail Britannia!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRIAw6LkqlE
 
Off the top of my head I can think of you giving a government position to someone who had been intent on sabotaging the nation. I feel that set a very bad precedent.
 
Off the top of my head I can think of you giving a government position to someone who had been intent on sabotaging the nation. I feel that set a very bad precedent.

Aww, you called me out on it. :p Yeah, I definitely regret that. Fortunately, I think that we've learned from it. More recent events have shown that characters who resort to such base tactics get what they deserve. And what they deserve is not what they want. I think that that "precedent" has been quashed, and since I'm certain that's what Arya was referring to, I find it kind of funny. :lol:
 
Well of course I did. You basically asked us to. :p

True, but if that episode reflects poorly on me, does it reflect well on your candidate? And are there other failures I must attribute to my name?
 
Wait a minute... I thought the elections were supposed to end on TUESDAY night, not Monday.

So, I think we should just fan out from St. Petersburg and march south. By the time this war is over, we should control all of European Russia. In the meantime, we should be building up a fleet to later invade the Arabian peninsula. Bring the war to them, so to speak.
 
True, but if that episode reflects poorly on me, does it reflect well on your candidate? And are there other failures I must attribute to my name?

Indeed, it was sordid for all involved. But arya, i believe, has reformed himself. His actions were not in the right, and neither was yours. However, you are still the one who set the precedent, which might have encouraged future behaviors in others..
 
Both other parties promise a swift war as if Arabia will be easily swept aside by our current army in no time at all. They are deluded. We could take the fight far into Russia as suggested by Arya, but we will not take all those cities and be able to hold them with the army we possess right now. We will be spread too thin trying to defend cities without sufficient and stable avenues of reinforcement.

I do not hide my caution, in fact I embrace it. I look at the two main parties donning the war paint and gearing up for a long trek into Russia fuelled by imperialist jingoism and I am horrified. To maintain our superiority we must act much more wisely, cautiously and only go to war when we are sure we can take our objectives AND hold them.

Ragnar is not a threat to be taken lightly, and yet you dismiss him as someone you can easily sway while you cut off his only avenue for expansion?

We must deal with matters closer to home. We must secure a peace with Arabia with the capture of Moscow, he knows he will not take it back. We must then unite the republic in Europe before expanding further afield. You are much too ambitious, much too reckless and out of touch with your people.

They are unhappy, they are unhealthy and all you seek to do is create more war? More unhappiness? More destruction? We must secure the lands we hold before we can hope to make significant strides abroad.

And Aysee, if your suggestion of a naval invasion of Arabia is approved by your leader, be prepared to spend the next centuries sifting through sand as our empire becomes more fragmented from the foolishness of reckless over-expansion.

The great empires of the past made the same mistakes - over expansion without preparing adequately for how they would keep it.

I implore both parties to not repeat it.
 
Don't bother to read this post, unless you have previously read the articles of Attacko, in which case read this post and :lol:

Fact:
Fortune Favours the Bold
Fact:
Great Empires are not Maintained by Timidity
Fact:
God Helps those Who Help themselves
Fact:
set at all instances to launch a counter attack

The Evidence is Clear: ATTACK!!!
Inspired by the great ATTACKO
:rolleyes:;):mischief::confused::crazyeye:

DT
Spouting Nonsense :ar15:
 
Firstly those are opinions not facts.

Secondly, this is exactly the type of imperialism I stand firmly against. We will likely face a minority government unless a party wishes to temper their plans to gain my support in a grand coalition.

Finally, empires may well be built on risk taking - but they also eventually fall because of it. We need to buck that trend by being responsible and measured instead of attacking everyone who threatens us and leaves us facing a hostile world who are united by their hatred of us.
 
I vote for Imperial and IMWP
 
Election Summery:
The Last update is on Post #8811 & Election ends Monday evening

Spoiler Our Empire :
civ4screenshot0312.jpg


The Co-Op & Veternari Party have disappeared. The Only people that have not voted that are publicly known and not lurkers are Darth Caeser and Lighthearter... Without the other two parties this could be in the bag for the Holy Britannia Alliance of Imperials and Warmongers.

The only other option now would be if two of the coalitions entered talks to come to a compromise to create a majority government... But there is bad blood on all sides... would such an event even be possible?

Election Concepts:
Here are some concepts that the Presidential Candidates should state their aims and thoughts upon.

Spoiler :
Government Spending
Science vs Money - With our clear tech advantage we could try to gain a even larger lead or cut back a bit to upgrade all out units

Economy
Capitalism vs Communism - The Final technologies are nearly there so the next leader must make a choice. Do we support communism with its free state and large land. Or Capitalism with it’s corporations and money.

Military
War vs Peace - Although we hurt Russia we have not hurt the Arabs… they will not talk to us about peace until we bloody their nose. But do we do just that? Or try to drive them all the way back to the middle east before we talk peace?

Ireland
Indepence vs Vassal vs Ally vs Rebels - Do we let Ireland stand alone with the risk that it falls once again to a foreign power? Do we demand they bow to us in servitude yet also protection? Or do we try to bind them to us as equals, through a Defensive Pact or Alliance? Do we bring them into our war? Or do we tell them enough is enough, that they are English not Irish and tell them they are a separate peoples no more?

Foreign
Intervention vs Isolation - We saw during Aysee’s term the flaws of concentrating on one target. While we stared down the Norse Vikings the Arabs declared war on the Russians and Indians to claim their holy cities. They claimed the Buddhist holy city and Capitluated Russia, but India managed to force the Arabs into a Cease Fire. (Most likely through the Aposalistic Palace) The Egyptians bowed to Shaka. The Americans became Christian and the Eastern Korea and Japan went to war. Thus what shall we do this time?

Technology
We are at a point where every tech helps. So which will you go for?
Democracy gives us civics and a wonder,
Communism gives us civics and a free Great Spy,
Corporations gives us it’s namesake and a +100% Gold national wonder,
Physics gives us Spy Airships and a Great Scientists,
Railroad gives us the possibility of Mining Inc. Railroads with x10 movement and the perfect defence in Machine Gunners,


Great People
Scientist & Engineer & Merchant
We soon have Corporations, Representation and a few wonders coming up. Will you found corporations pursuing capitalistic aims? Settle them with Representation? Quickly Grab a wonder?

Expansion
Manifest Destiny vs War with Primitive Natives vs Peaceful Colonization - We can expand continuously to the east till the Great British Empire stretches from shore to shore. Or we can strike a boundary in Asia then turn our eyes elsewhere, either to the primitive natives overseas or too unclaimed land elsewhere to create colonies around the world.


Politician Votes:
Ravus = Jokers & IngSoc
Aysee = Jokers & IngSoc
Mechaerik = Jokers & IngSoc
Twinkletoes = Sanity & Green
Dukeblackstone = Sanity
Fellow = Sanity & Green
West India Man = Sanity & Green
Gruekiller = Jokers & IngSoc
NinjaCow = Imperial & War
DemTaqat = Imperial & War
Whosit = Imperial & War
Ono-Neko = Imperial & War
Arya = IngSoc & Jokers
Celtic Fury = Imperial & War
Sonereal = Imperial & War
NukeKnockout = Imperial & War

Parties:
Jokers = 5
IngSoc = 5
Sanity = 4
Green = 3
Imperial = 7
War = 7

Coalitions:
The Patriots (Jokers / IngSoc) = 10
Current Candidate = Arya
Current Views = See Posts #8869 & #8880
  • Spending = Technology & Minor Money for Upgrades
  • Technology = Railroad, Communism, Physics & Democracy
  • Economy = Communism
  • Military = Take Arabian Holdings in Russia then Completely Destroy Russia
  • Ireland = Held in Stasis untill the war is over. Offer to Bring Khan and Ireland into a United Kingdom with each state given a level of Autonomy as long as they are still under our control.
  • Foriegn = Befriend Carthage & India, Spread Christianity to them. Eye up everyone else for weaknesses and deal with in order, Arab-Russia, Norse-Greek, Americas & Shaka
  • Great People = Engineer for Statue of Liberty, Merchent for money trip, Scientist for Academy
  • Expansion = Through Warfare. Control all of Europe, Ignore Asia, Gain Colonies overseas.


Green-Sanity (Green Party / Party to Restore Sanity) = 7
Current Candidate = Twinkletoes
Current Views = See Full Post #8839
  • Spending = Technology
  • Technology = Railroad, Physics & Communism
  • Economy = Communism
  • Military = Moscow then Peace ASAP
  • Ireland = Returned to Khan, but bound to us in some way.
  • Foreign = Secure the Empire, then turn eyes to The America for future expansion.
  • Great People = Engineer for Statue of Liberty, Merchent for money trip, Scientist for Settling
  • Expansion = Secure Europe, Sail to America

Holy Britannian Alliance (Imperial / War Party) = 14
Current Candidate = Whosit
Current Views = See Post #8855
  • Spending = Technology & Minor Money for Upgrades
  • Technology = Railroad, Physics, Communism & Aim for Industrialism for more Military Techs
  • Economy = Communism
  • Military = Push back the Arabs, Secure the Empire then continue pushing as long as we hold Military Supremacy.
  • Ireland = Independence for Khan, Not Vassal-hood.
  • Foreign = Focus on our Arab Enemy. Play nice and keep an eye on Ragnar and other Rival Powers (E.g. Shaka). Befriend Americas.
  • Great People = No Corporations, Settle or build the Scientist, Send Merchant overseas, Use Engineer for Statue of Liberty or Pentagon
  • Expansion = Expand via our conquered enemies land first. Only then when the threat is removed turn expansive eyes elsewhere.

-

PS - Can we get that first page updated?
 
@TT- It wasn't intendet to be serious, I was just presenting the arguements in a style similar to Troytheface's attacko articles, which are 'jokes disguised as strategies.' It was an attept to show that many people find attacking to be the best strategy, and In civ4 collateral damage means the person with seige initiative will generally win. After all 'the best defence is a good offense' and we should get as much as we can out of redcoats whilst their still around. After all, are'nt they the units used in the height of the british empire? I agree we can't ignore Ragnar, but pragmatism right now,to me, means taking advantage of the fact that we didn't have to DOW them, and so Curbstomping them without diplomatic repurcussions. We can handle Ragnar if he attacks us, because we can draft Churchill's Redcoats. It's the second most effeciant draft in the entire Game, and 2-4 turns mass drafting can easily raise a force strong enough to stop his attack, unless he got cannons without anybody noticing.

Edit: X-post
YAY!!! We're winnning! :D

DT
Crusader for the Cause :jesus:
 
TT-- If we wait, what will happen is Arabia will grow huge, and thus become even BIGGER and STRONGER if we attack. Ragnar's army will have returned, and as you've said, he'll not sit on his hands while we enclose him.
If we wait, we are doomed.

If we attack now: Arabia is still trying to pacify the Russian cities. Ragnar's army is yet to return. If we attack now, there is a greater chance of succeeding.

And your right about the cities being impossible to hold. That's why we should raze them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom