Cull
Big Daddy
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2010
- Messages
- 2,838
Remember when I said I alreadly signed you up in class? Yeah. Welcome to the brawl, and enjoy! Talk later.
Sweet! Feel free to post, and debate all you want. That goes of you too, MathNerd.
I want to address this first. How did coalitions form? Why, they had similar ideas, and goals. The issue that we(speaking as the opposition) was that we believed that the CoD's parties are so unique and different, that there is no way that the parties involved will reach a definite compromise, for their agendas are so vastly different. Is diddling around, and doing nothing major, national interest? Is that pragmatism. No, its the idea of fools. And are you a fool? Is your coalition, which is barely able to agree on one issue, able to lead Britain to greatness?
This comes second. Honestly my first reaciton was, "Really?" From what I understand, by the time we get to the New World the GW will be gone. Rather, let's turn to the super continent, the Mainland Europe-Asia-Africa. If CoD, bunch of fools they are, are able to launch a settling fleet to France, and chop/build/whip the GW, that would be an achievement, that glistens in the sun, for them.
And this is last. The first paragraph I can agree with, but the rest, ugh, let's start then. The second paragraph, is bull. Doubtlessly, the adviser from the party with the most votes will be the one most listened too. Will the Nationalists have their sway, and force men and women of all ages to fight dead-end wars, all for the so-called greater good of England? Will the LMP have the President's ear, or be the President, and further their own evil goals? Yikes. More balanced? No, just more corrupt, and insane. Find a compromise? A real compromise? No, just a heavily-biased one that favors the party with the President's favor at the time. Easier to please everyone? To answer that, is a corrupt, inefficient, boggled-down, weak government going to please everyone? Nope.
As for my idea, I still stand by it. The idea was that no new person could just walk in, join, and change the tide. They can still debate, and participate, just not vote. I thought I clearly conveyed that, but I guess not. We wouldn't ban them as you so elegantly said. We believe Arya came in at a bad time, changing the once 50-50 chance into nothing for the First Coalition. The voting was supposed to end that very night! And you can say you just swung votes? Changing a tie, to a victory for one party in the very last hours? Of course that makes sense. What I am proposing is designed so that new members can do everything, BUT vote, as it would throw everything into disarray.
Pfft, the Americas. No, just no. Even by galley, if it even possible, then we would be too late. I say build TGW in the Super-Continent, and leave it at that. And walls in every city helping? They just increase defensive bonus, so 0 defenders still is 0 defenders, and 5 defenders is still better than 4 most of the time. I can understand your position on Stonehenge though.
-Cull
-Leader of the Opposition
Yeah, this was all peacy and what not. Page 11, last post.
