Guys, you know LH has alot on his p[late right now? Bothering him for screens probably doesnt help. Maybe just send him a friendly PM to remind him if he doesnt deliver them after a while. Either way, screens are not mandatory. I know whosit will be upset that he wont be able to do all his fancy math stuff, but i rarely do that even when i have screens in my games, and i turn out fine. We can do perfectly fine without screens, and i think we have enough of a grasp on the situation to do without them until the fiurst turnset is over and we get an update.
Yeah i guess you are right MN, but a city there in the future should be crucial. Come to think of it, our culture MIGHT NOT cover that area. I will have to check later. If it doesnt, then either late in your term MN, or the next president, should put a city there so nobody else takes it.
I am not against a reducement in maintenence costs, but we are not even sure if we are getting this colonial modifier. If we are, then deal with it. Its probably not much, especially as our cities arent that far from London. Plus, London is the BEST CITY WE HAVE. RY doesnt have the production to be a good capital. Kent, maybe if it can grow a little more, same with antium. I think a city on the eastern pyrenees could be a capital, but there would still be minimal gain. We would be wasting hammers.