Red Europe

[Sarevok]

To add another thing, polls are used (or at least I use them like this) in order to find problems with their scenario and fix them. People leave comments to complement them when the scenario is good, and they give problms when they believe a scenario is missing anything or just isnt very good so that the scenario can be improved. There have been NO bad comments on this scenario, and yet those two people rate without reason, or at least a reason involving how good the scenario is. So Sturmgewehr, where did I mess up on this scenario?

 

[Sarevok]

ok, over 150 people have downloaded this scenario, and I have recieved no bad comments other that the two non-explained rates in the poll. Am I to assume that this scenario is good as is?

 

[Sarevok]

good! Ill take the 3-day silence as a yes. If any changes are needed, just post them here and ill make v1.1

 

[Sarevok]

I just posted up my new Blue Europe scenario, which uses the same map and most of the same nations. It is set to be in May 1940, after the Soviet Invasion has done some damage to europe.You play as the New Prime Minister Winston Churchill, and you must rally Europe to staunch the Red Tide.

 

[Sarevok]

im hearing good stuff about Blue europe, are people still playing this?

 

[Moby]

i still need to get Blue. but i got REd and, although a bit long to load, it's great. I'm really glad that all of your units dont start out in one city. ive seen that one too many times. I'll go get Blue now.

 

[Sarevok]

I had to naturally spead units out, i have seen those scenarios that you mentinoed with all units in one city. I look at scns in the editor before play, and if I see them like that, I dont even play them.

By the way, about load time. many have noticed this game has a long loading time, especially in contrast to Two Towers, which was less than a minute. I would like to shorten it, but then the game would be less fun...

 

[sela1s1son]

Looks great... haven't played just yet, but it looks great.

 

[Sarevok]

im glad you think so sela1s1son. what do you think of it?

 

[Sarevok]

Poland took 2 turns, Scandinavia 8, turkey 8, germany 3, france 1. Ive got ICBM's and the british and US are neutral. What more could i ask for?

 

[Lynx]

I dont know, it took me only 3 turns to kill greece and italy at the same time, have you killed them yet?

 

[Sarevok]

no, not yet.

 

[Sims2789]

could you please make a non-PTW version
________
Smoke Kills

 

[Lynx]

I have heard this before...

 

[Sarevok]

Actually, this scenario would be EXTREMELY hard to make for PTW, as there are many thigs that would screw up in the scenario. This is my final version, Anyway. (wow, it never needed to be updated!)

 

[Metacomet]

Nothing is perfect, everything needs improvement. Think about.

 

[Sarevok]

Very true, but I never really got complaints about the scenario, which tells me It doesent really need improvement.

 

[Metacomet]

If you want complaint I'm your man.

First Ireland was independent since 1922, and let me check for more complains, but I like better sugestions

 

[Metacomet]

I will eliminate the idea of neutral nations, because I don't know why Portugal is in war with me if I attack Denmark. It's a nonsense. Remember that we can have 31 civilizations.

But if you don't like a lot of civilizations you can create a area aliances like Scandinavia (but we need to talk about this one, because I'm not so sure), Lower nations, Balkans, Central Europe...

I think that it could be nice. But the best it will be each independent country with locked aliances. Well I can wait one month..or no!!!!

 

[Sarevok]

This is an Old Scenario, and it was my third one at that. i know there are things that can be fixed. Wait till conquests... then ill give you a great scenario im planning on making on WW1.