Bamspeedy
CheeseBob
Personally I think the rankings should have given more weight to roads and bridges than internet access. How to fairly balance the rankings to give some states who have greater challenges (like population density) I don't know.
Last thing about the rankings and the thread topic, so where was Kansas ranked before this experiment? I have a feeling Kansas was not going to be in the top 10 overall rankings, with or without this experiment that's been in effect for 4-5 years. (or does someone have a very similar study from 2012 or before), There are a lot of 'best state' rankings, but they all use different criteria (best for business, best to live in, best to retire in, etc.), let alone which stats they use and how to weigh them, it's not a very valid comparison.
Last thing about the rankings and the thread topic, so where was Kansas ranked before this experiment? I have a feeling Kansas was not going to be in the top 10 overall rankings, with or without this experiment that's been in effect for 4-5 years. (or does someone have a very similar study from 2012 or before), There are a lot of 'best state' rankings, but they all use different criteria (best for business, best to live in, best to retire in, etc.), let alone which stats they use and how to weigh them, it's not a very valid comparison.