zagyg said:First let me say that your mod is the only one I play now.I absolutly love it.
Thank you. Vote please!
zagyg said:But in the months I have been playing, the North America thing has been driving me mad! I even read through all 27 pages to see what others had said about it and I understand why the continent was made the way it is - to slow the americans from dominating.
Yes it is very crippled in the beginning but when America hits Feudalism (should happen in the game in ca. 1500) suddelnly cattle and wheat appear (European exportation) and America starts to grow faster. More resources will appear later, and it seems that in the Industrial Age America fills the gap (well, in my test games it happened).
There is so much Tundra in Canada for one reason: if Iroquois settle near the lakes, they'll have much food (from lakes) and shields (from forests) and begin an unstoppable expansion which makes them stronger than America. So it's better reducing the tiles available for settlement.
zagyg said:As for the entire 'should there be an america at all' thread, there probably shouldn't be - it is historically incorrect in the early stages of the game (might as well start with Afrikaneers too). But if you want a european civ in North america, you might think about the Irish (c. 484) or the Norse(c.1000). Cut out the Americans. Maybe a seperate civ would start in Iceland or Ireland with one ocean going vessal and one settler and one military unit. Have to make their way there, etc....
If only Firaxis had implemented events like in Civ2

zagyg said:just a couple ideas I had. Oh, and two things - first, this is bugging me. From earlier in the thread - China and India had contact (how do you think the chinese got buddhism?) early on. In 645 Hsuan-Tang returned from a pilgrimage to india, 800 years before Emperor Zhu Di sent out the treasure fleet. I'm Just a stickler for historical accuracy.![]()
After an old patch early contact between China and India is possible
zagyg said:lastly - why do you refer to Livorno as 'the italian stalingrad'?
That's the way Berlusconi called it. In fact he fears Livorno because it's the most "left oriented" city in Italy, where the communist party takes the 30%, the moderate left wing takes a 40% and the rest of the parties (centre and right, including Berlusconi's Forza Italia) share the remaining votes. Though I hate Berlusconi, I don't agree with excesses of fanatism (like commemorations of Soviet Union, see photo below) and anti-Americanism that happen here, but that's my city and I must accept it.