Traitorfish
The Tighnahulish Kid
My puzzlement is more at the idea that borders can be "natural" to begin with. Borders exist between polities, and polities are wholly unnatural.
Long live the Great Slavic Union and a wall with 1 km. height between eternal friends Poland and Russia.The eternal peace and friendship treaty will be then concluded, and a wall will be built along the Vistula/Dniepr basin border.
How is that any less arbitrary?That's the point, for them to stop being arbitrary and depending on the current polity's ambitions. Polities' boundaries in our example should coincide with natural borders, namely Vistula/Dniepr watershed and be universally recognized as such.
red_elk said:Long live the Great Slavic Union and a wall with 1 km. height between eternal friends Poland and Russia.
Veles was talking about Great Slavic Union, including Poland, Russia and a big wall between them.Why stop at that border?
Sure, but would you say that the Duchy of Hanover was part of the Kingdom of Great Britain?It was owned by the family that sat on the Danish throne, which is close enough for most people.
Veles was talking about Great Slavic Union, including Poland, Russia and a big wall between them.
red_elk said:Veles was talking about Great Slavic Union, including Poland, Russia and a big wall between them.
Hmm, that first map showing the Odra basin suggests Poland should annex Czech Silesia.
millions of Poles lived there during the Rzeczpospolita and Second Republic, outnumbering Belorussians and Ukrainians.
@Domen, yay or nay to Krolewiec? We could use another major Baltic port if we want the rest of Europe to take us seriously.
I even managed to find a photo of that big wall between them:
That's up to another eternal friends of Poland and members of our great union.I was talking about walling off Poland completely.
That certainly can't be true. A whole massive of peasants weren't Poles and they were a majority. The majority of the dwellers of some cites could have been Polish, but surely Poles could have never been the overwhelming majority. And millions? Well a couple of million, maybe.
No, but that's not an equivalent statement. If the original claim had been that Holstein had been part of "the Kingdom of Denmark", then yes, it would have obviously been wrong. But TLO just said "Denmark", which can reasonably be said to represent the totality of lands under the control of the forces and government of the monarch in charge of Denmark. That's a generally accepted usage. Nobody says that Bohemia or Hungary or Lombardy wasn't part of "Austria", or that Finland wasn't part of "Russia", or that Bremen-Verden and Pomerania weren't part of "Sweden".Sure, but would you say that the Duchy of Hanover was part of the Kingdom of Great Britain?
The area around Brest, Lwow, Tarnopol, Grodno, Kaunas and Vilnius were peasants who were Polish speaking.