cierdan said:No it doesn't. It just shows that:
1. He may have been trying to cover up a crime by having her killed AND CREMATEDwhen she never wanted to be cremated in the first place.
Your thesis is quite empty and does not make sense at all. If there were the slightest signal towards the direction of a murder, cremation would not be allowed before autopsy were performed and autopsy is by far and large the most effective manner to find traces of subtle assassinations.
If that man feared that his crime would be found, the best thing he could possibly do were to keep her alive, and delay the only thing that could even theoretically get him the autopsy allowing for traces of the crime to disappear, or the crime itself to expire.
cierdan said:2. Once it got in the public eye, he wouldn't want to reverse course at any point anyway even putting aside a motive for covering up foul play since reversing course at that point would just ruins one's reputation.
As opposed to the delightful reputation that he now enjoys?
cierdan said:He didn't care for her fully. He ordered that therapy be not given to her. One of the nurses who witnessed this has now spoken out. She tried to help Terri with something but was told by him that she couldn't since that was "therapy."
I dont know the circumstances of that fact, but Id like to see links pointed out as to what kind of therapy he denied her and why did he do that. Could you point me to where you read about it? Because caring for her in a mild manner when it would be much easier to let her under the care of her parents does not make much sense.
cierdan said:You don't express profound feelings for someone by continuing to cheat on them and live with another woman.
No, you do that taking charge of demanding medical care and facing a public fight for what you consider right for someone.
Perhaps in Hollywood when a person cheats his/her better half, it instantly means that this person is a cold-blooded bastard that has no human feelings and want to assassinate the other but in real life things are a little different, you know?
Besides, since you didnt made a point of this, I tend to think that this relationship he engaged and you vilified happened after Miss Schiavos breakdown when I can hardly call it cheating.
Care to either confirm or set me straight?
cierdan said:I don't know why you talk about her parents' "religious zeal" since according to her husband, they aren't very religious.
Perhaps I was fooled by the contour of the public debate the details of the Schindlers family was not dug in very deeply here, as this case was kind of peripheral in our press, unlike what happened in the US. However, even if they were not zealots in general, and even if they never used the religious argument on behalf of their perception of what should have happened, they were unreasonable in their baseless defense, and found fertile terrain in the religious zeal of others to support their own flawed ideas.
cierdan said:BTW, the lead lawyer for the Gore side in Bush versus Gore -- the US Supreme Court case that decided the 2000 election -- has expressed sympathy and support for Terri Shiavo and her family's plight, saying for example that the US Court of Appeals ought to stay the withdrawal of food and water from Terri (back when she was still alive).
Whats this, an appeal to authority? If all the reasoning he can offer to suggesting that this is what should happened is the way his sympathies works, the fact that he happens to be a famous lawyer simply has no effect in my disagreement from his position.
I have much more sympathy for the Suffering that this woman was needlessly having to bare and the fight that her former husband engaged to end it.
On a side note: even if he were a murderer and had really caused her collapse and latter acted to hide his crime as you suggested, despite this seems to lack substance it does not change at all the fact that euthanasia was the best path for her. She would have to be put out of her misery, and he arrested, and thats it because, no matter how frustrating this may be to those who fought to keep her as an actual golen for years to come, Mr. Schiavo was defending the right thing to Miss Schiavo even if for the wrong reasons.
Regards
