Lexicus
Deity
I though it was a 7-2 ruling, maybe my are confusion me?
I just want to draw attention for a moment to the absolute brilliance of this sentence.
And muddying everything is their complete preoccupation with building a nation on a foundation of slavery. While the EC did have a nominal secondary function as a backstop against demagogues, the main reason for its existence was to uphold slave-state power. We have a modern re-interpretation of that as a power-balance of small states against large states but the main power-balance intended was slaveowners against freestaters.
Very much so.
Actually recently read this great piece on Roger Sherman, an unsung villain of the original Constitution, that touches on a lot of these notes.
https://thebaffler.com/latest/tear-down-this-statue-kreitner
Sherman was largely responsible for the two-house structure of Congress, as well as the provision that the equal representation of states in the Senate cannot be amended except by unanimous consent of all the states.
Up to now, Northerners and other Americans without personal connection to the antebellum South have largely luxuriated in the assumption that they have nothing to apologize for and no heroes in need of reconsideration. But perpetuating the Union on the basis of slavery, right up until the Civil War, was a national project that enjoyed, but for a few scattered abolitionists, national support. Similarly, much of the federal government’s current paralysis is directly the fault of the Constitution’s enshrinement of colonial-era divisions and states’-rights ideology in the structure of our governing institutions. Taking Sherman off his Capitol Hill pedestal would mark a worthy beginning, but one that is ultimately symbolic. Of far greater substance and significance would be doing away with that even more prominent monument to the founders’ fetish for compromise and corrupt bargains: the Senate of the United States.