- Joined
- Aug 12, 2010
- Messages
- 18,949
Perhaps Embarkation cannot be done at cliffs.
OR units take damage as they hurl themselves off the cliff into the sea.

Perhaps Embarkation cannot be done at cliffs.
Depth of field is really silly in strategy games. You're obscuring my vision.
"Screenshot analysis" should mean working out strategy/gameplay elements from screenshots...
Instead we've got 7 pages of artistic criticism.
This is what's wrong with Civ. FFS.
Resources anyone? Unit types anyone?
I agree! The coastal wonder that resembles the Colossus (but clearly is NOT)...is that Poseidon? What could that be?
This. I see no reason I should feel nearsighted while playing a game where I'm supposed to know everything going on in my field of view.
I think the city style is early East Asian from comparing it to the Japan pics. Based on the colors and the fact that they get included earlier and earlier with each iteration, I'd guess it's Korea.
It's definitely Portugal - if you look closely the culture style of the city, it looks almost Gaulic, with the hay roofs; definitely seems like the generic European style for ancient/classical era.
Perhaps, although America is typically depicted with a white border and a blue interior.Or it could be America.
Depth of field is really silly in strategy games. You're obscuring my vision.
At least, put it in the engine so people who like it have it, and people who don't can disable it. Like in games like Anno
From what I see here, it doesn't look like it will be the case...
How can you tell that it won't be an option based on a few stills specifically created for use in online publications/promotional material?
If they made it, it would probably be there in the screenshots.
I don't agree. There's no text in the screenshots, but I don't think that means they didn't design text boxes. Depth of field might obscure what they want to show off in the images, so it might be off for that reason. Or maybe it's an option, but they don't consider it the default so they kept the option turned off.
It definitely might not be an option, and maybe the chances are below 50% so technically your statement could be correct, but my point is there's still a lot of uncertainty.