Pegasus_77
Prince of the Wealth
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2013
- Messages
- 226
Do you think it delay or encourage the first sexual intercourse?
Research clearly shows that comprehensive sex education programs do not encourage teens to start having sexual intercourse; do not increase the frequency with which teens have intercourse; and do not increase the number of a teen's sexual partners. At the same time, evaluations of publicly funded abstinence-only programs have repeatedly shown no positive changes in sexual behaviors over time.
...To say the least, it helps reduce the incidence of STDs when teenagers use condoms or things like it.
But does it encourage the first sex experience ?
I think in an ideal setting it would be a real help to teens. But in the current school setting it is prone to be seen as a joke/awkward etc.
I don't recall if we ever had any such course (maybe just one lesson? maybe none at all, maybe three for a sole week or something).
The problem is the overall crappy situation of society which renders this another point of issues. Btw there are many girls (and not just girls) in the late teen age who pretty much suffer heavy trauma due to all this.
Research clearly shows that comprehensive sex education programs do not encourage teens to start having sexual intercourse; do not increase the frequency with which teens have intercourse; and do not increase the number of a teen's sexual partners. At the same time, evaluations of publicly funded abstinence-only programs have repeatedly shown no positive changes in sexual behaviors over time.
Do you think it delay or encourage the first sexual intercourse?
Kyriakos said:No, i just alluded to the fact that (sadly) here -at least when i was in late highschool- we virtually had no such course at all.
Really? That's strange. Isn't Greece generally a fairly progressive place?
In contrast, in grade 6 in Germany my biology class was shown an explicit video of a man and woman having sex, as a part of the sex-ed portion of the course.
yea, unconsciously I think it is like what you say. More knowledge, less ignorance thus less reckless behaviorsStudies show sex education delays sexual activity and decreases STDs and unwanted pregnancies. Link. (Scroll to the bottom portion entitled "Effectiveness of Sex Education Programs.")
If you're more knowledgeable about sex and its consequences, it makes sense that you would make a more informed decision on when you want to begin having sex.
If it reduces the negative consequences of being sexually active - unwanted pregnancy and STDs - would it really matter if it encouraged earlier sexual activity? (Again, the data seem to point to it discouraging such.)
We are more on the doom metal side of things :S
Even if it did encourage earlier sex, I would say the benefits outweigh the costs. Young people who are informed about the risks and educated on how to prevent diseases and trauma will go on to be much healthier in their development than if they began early and were clueless through it all.
@Tails: Since children express sexual curiosity starting from the age of 3 or 4, I don't think it'd be fair to consider teenagers as being incapable of grasping their minds around sex.
Since children express sexual curiosity starting from the age of 3 or 4, I don't think it'd be fair to consider teenagers as being incapable of grasping their minds around sex.
Truly comprehensive sex education would of necessity address the emotional issues involved.
In contrast, in grade 6 in Germany my biology class was shown an explicit video of a man and woman having sex, as a part of the sex-ed portion of the course.
We did have biology textbooks describing accurately all sexual behaviors
Sex ed needs a lab course.