The grassland hill vs camp is either right or wrong.
Mining the grassland hill is equal to buying one hammer early, and paying 10-20 commerce for that hammer over a longer period.
It's a very high price, but if the lone hammer makes the settler come out quicker, it might well be worth it.
I would go for the corn, thats the safe play, planting a city further north might block off Pacal, but then maybe Zara or Hanni will gobble up that corn.
IF you go for the floodplain area, I wouldn't settle in the forest as you mention, I would plant where the scout is I think.
Yeah, it kills a floodplain, but it gets two forest in first ring and it has enough floodplains anyway.
It also has some hills which can be helpful for a early attack.
Might go for another settler right after the first one, planting there and farming one floodplain those two cities share.
But exacly where to place such a city (if at all possible) will be easier to tell later on.
From what is still visible, I would go NE of the corn, on that hill.
Mining the grassland hill is equal to buying one hammer early, and paying 10-20 commerce for that hammer over a longer period.
It's a very high price, but if the lone hammer makes the settler come out quicker, it might well be worth it.
I would go for the corn, thats the safe play, planting a city further north might block off Pacal, but then maybe Zara or Hanni will gobble up that corn.

IF you go for the floodplain area, I wouldn't settle in the forest as you mention, I would plant where the scout is I think.
Yeah, it kills a floodplain, but it gets two forest in first ring and it has enough floodplains anyway.
It also has some hills which can be helpful for a early attack.
Might go for another settler right after the first one, planting there and farming one floodplain those two cities share.
But exacly where to place such a city (if at all possible) will be easier to tell later on.
From what is still visible, I would go NE of the corn, on that hill.