Symphony D.
Deity
OOC: It's your $500 Billion - $1 Trillion, not mine (then again, I have all the prerequisite technology).OOC: Just watch us.
Oh, yeah, and you can't own extraplanetary territory anyway.
OOC: It's your $500 Billion - $1 Trillion, not mine (then again, I have all the prerequisite technology).OOC: Just watch us.
1.5 from Americas (no point in having a separate slot for North America, as most of North America is USA which is a permanent member)
1.5 from Americas (no point in having a separate slot for North America, as most of North America is USA which is a permanent member)
1 from Europe
1 from Middle-East + North Africa (North Africa resembles Middle East more than the SubSaharan Africa from all angles, and Middle East does not have anything in common with the Far East Asia)
1 from Sub-saharan Africa
1.5 from rest of Asia + Oceania
1.5 means one period they have 1 country, the next they have 2. The two 1.5's are alternating so their total is always 3, never 2 or 4.
The People's Republic of China has reviewed your proposal and rejects it outright. We are open to allowing more nations into the UNSC, but to demand that the United States, France, United Kingdom, Russian Federation, and the People's Republic of China give up their veto's power is totally unrealistic. Further more to compare the losses of Brazil to the People Republic of China during WWII is insulting to us. Millions of Chinese died at the hands of the Japanese, the PRC missed the point during WWII where this happened to Brazil. When you do this you have disshonored the memory of the millions of people in Europe, the United States, Russia, and China that fougt against the forces of Oppression.
Not too good at geography, are you? Australia alone is a continent, though we're usually lumped in with Oceania. Still, why is our region worth mention seemingly only as an afterthought? If you plan to compare casualties, the Germans and Chinese are right, their losses were hundreds of times heavier than yours. Hell, Australia's losses were heavier than yours. Eighty-eight times heavier, in fact.
But that's irrelevant. The point is that, for the most part, the current permanent members have served the world's interests fine. After all, we're still alive, aren't we?
"A death is a tragedy, a million is a statistic" - Stalin
Also, France refuses to accept the Brazilian proposal (It will not work, no one will agree to who gets to Vote. The world is still very much divided along national lines, and nations of the same continent still hate eachother very much. It is this same kind of thinking, of disregard for national borders and sovriegnty, which lead to the failure of the EU constitution. The world, unfortunately, is not perfect - No continent will agree to one distinct representative save maybe North America. I see this simply as a ploy by Brazil to gain power) Nicolas Sarkozy has won the elections, but France has yet to put a story up and will not have time
The Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea dislikes the proposal made by Brazil, since we have no chance of gaining a seat or a vote, we wouldnt want to be represented by only one Asian power who doesnt share our views, whitch would be likely in such an arrangement
We fully support the Brazillian Proposal! We give it our unequivocal support.
OOC
@ Darkening
Dude, if you pay attention to what's being posted, you won't have to write such long (and obsolete/invalid/irrelevant) replies.
1- My posts have nothing to do with continents.
2- Your reply claims I said things that I haven't.
3- We already had some exchange of ideas over my first proposal, about which you figuratively scream in your post. Your opposition is obsolete, as I already reiterated my suggestion, with separate slots for NAmerica and Oceania, several dozen posts ago.
and by the way, when I said I applauded your proposal, I wasn't being sarcastic. Apparently when you get multiple criticisms, you tend to go berserk and argue against anybody, including people partially agreeing with you.
2- Your reply claims I said things that I haven't.
3- We already had some exchange of ideas over my first proposal, about which you figuratively scream in your post. Your opposition is obsolete, as I already reiterated my suggestion, with separate slots for NAmerica and Oceania, several dozen posts ago.
~Darkening~ dont take thing personal that are said IC
of course I am, I said you aren't paying attention to what's being posted, not who's posting it. Because you apparently did not look at the posts that followed the post you quoted, and also you misinterpreted the post you quoted.Appearntly you're not the one who said
"1.5 from Americas (no point in having a separate slot for North America, as most of North America is USA which is a permanent member)
1 from Europe
1 from Middle-East + North Africa (North Africa resembles Middle East more than the SubSaharan Africa from all angles, and Middle East does not have anything in common with the Far East Asia)
1 from Sub-saharan Africa
1.5 from rest of Asia + Oceania"
Are those not continents?
Really? Show me where and I'll gladly change it.
...
He forgot South America!
...
Africa is not two continents either
What is up with all of you people and having things your way? Just because you guys come to a conclusion I'm not allowed to argue my point- the same exact thing you're currently doing?
What, am I supposed to shut up when you command me to?
EDIT: Sorry if I get a little annoyed when people try to insult me, try to shut me up whenever its my turn to debate, and whenever I don't agree with them.