Shaitan
der Besucher
Georgia Flag, 1956 to 2001
New Georgia Flag (aka "King Roy" flag), 2001 to present
In 2001 Georgia Governor Roy Barnes forced through legislation that changed the Georgia state flag to remove the "Stars & Bars" (aka "Union Jack"). King Roy was capitulating to a very vocal segment that connected the Stars & Bars to slavery. Popular polls were strongly against the change so Barnes opted not to subject his legislation to a popular referendum (where it would have been soundly defeated). As a token gesture to the majority he had a small Jack added to the "emblem" area of the new flag.
Our new flag has been proclaimed as the ugliest flag in America by the North American Vexillological Association.
Our new governor Sonny Purdue (Barnes lost reelection, most pundits site the flag issue) wants to bring several flag versions up and let the people pick via popular referendum. Sound like a fair democratic process? Aparently too democratic. Various special interest groups are now filing court cases to prevent a popular referendum and force Sonny to keep the current flag. Yes, those special interest groups are the same ones that Barnes was trying to placate in the first place.
The major point of contention is obviously the Union Jack on the flag. Proponents argue that this is not a symbol of slavery, it is a symbol of Southern (and particularly Georgian) heritage and history. It was here before the Civil War and has been with us ever since. Think "Dukes of Hazard". Opponents say it is a symbol of degradation and abuse. Think "Deliverance".
What do you think? In this day and age is it appropriate to have the Rebel Flag figured prominently on a state flag? Is the Union Jack so tainted by the Antebellum period that it should be banned from civil use? Like so many other things, should we make the Georgia flag as "politically correct" as possible? What's more important, a state's history or just the parts that you want to remember?

New Georgia Flag (aka "King Roy" flag), 2001 to present

In 2001 Georgia Governor Roy Barnes forced through legislation that changed the Georgia state flag to remove the "Stars & Bars" (aka "Union Jack"). King Roy was capitulating to a very vocal segment that connected the Stars & Bars to slavery. Popular polls were strongly against the change so Barnes opted not to subject his legislation to a popular referendum (where it would have been soundly defeated). As a token gesture to the majority he had a small Jack added to the "emblem" area of the new flag.
Our new flag has been proclaimed as the ugliest flag in America by the North American Vexillological Association.
Our new governor Sonny Purdue (Barnes lost reelection, most pundits site the flag issue) wants to bring several flag versions up and let the people pick via popular referendum. Sound like a fair democratic process? Aparently too democratic. Various special interest groups are now filing court cases to prevent a popular referendum and force Sonny to keep the current flag. Yes, those special interest groups are the same ones that Barnes was trying to placate in the first place.
The major point of contention is obviously the Union Jack on the flag. Proponents argue that this is not a symbol of slavery, it is a symbol of Southern (and particularly Georgian) heritage and history. It was here before the Civil War and has been with us ever since. Think "Dukes of Hazard". Opponents say it is a symbol of degradation and abuse. Think "Deliverance".
What do you think? In this day and age is it appropriate to have the Rebel Flag figured prominently on a state flag? Is the Union Jack so tainted by the Antebellum period that it should be banned from civil use? Like so many other things, should we make the Georgia flag as "politically correct" as possible? What's more important, a state's history or just the parts that you want to remember?