Mirc
Not mIRC!!!




That's what Bucharest is going to get!!


Skyscrapers?
I don't think the height of the Freedom Tower is what New Yorkians should be ashamed of; the name of the tower is just![]()
Blasphemy!Cheezy the Wiz said:Remember, skyscrapers are symbols of evil western imperialism. Money=teh bad.
It's possible to build the thing in New York, Tokyo, London, or Shanghai... but Dubai? I think they're asking for trouble.That's exactly what I was thinking. It's just totally foolish to build such enormous buildings these days.
What?^ BTW, did the Chinese government manage to do that skyscraper farming after all?![]()
Greenhouses in buildings? Not that feasible an idea IMO. The top storey is the only place where you can place one that will receive sufficient sunshine (or you can leave it open and turn it into a field) but even then the area won't be very large. Also cereal crop fields will need deeper soil. Rice needs waterlogged paddies. All this means more structural requirements. No way I say. At best they can probably have a small vegetable farm up there.
It's possible to build the thing in New York, Tokyo, London, or Shanghai... but Dubai? I think they're asking for trouble.
It looks like the Burj is adopting the cigarette pack approach the engineer and architect of Sears Tower did.
Chicago's next potential tall building is not proposed to be that tall. The Burj will be about 15% taller (2300 ft.) than the oversized birthday candle 115 story Santiago Calatrava "Fordham Spire" (2000 ft). It will be quite an engineering and architectural marvel if it gets done (The twisting shape means no wind sway. The building would move 2 degrees with each floor and 270 degrees from top to bottom and cantilevered for unobstructed views).
![]()
I see Trump Tower going up fast and it looks like he's been forced to abide by Chicago's great architectural style and melds very well with the significant buildings surrounding it.
Remember, skyscrapers are symbols of evil western imperialism. Money=teh bad.
No, its just that we could use money for far more better purposes, not on some ridicolous penis contest.
No, its just that we could use money for far more better purposes, not on some ridicolous penis contest.
There's no such law there that I'm aware of. It's just customary for many women.Dubai still requires women to be fully veiled at all times in public. I think they're okay from an Islamic terrorism standpoint.
We? Who do you think builds the skyscrapers? The government?