JacquesBquick
Chieftain
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2016
- Messages
- 96
this is also disappointing to me if it turns out to be true. especially given evidence of particular leaders' straying from the straight and narrow path...it seems like an unnecessary subtraction by addition. we didn't really need these new agendas, and all they do is exclude rather than include.Oh. Well that's pretty disappointing. Didn't really everyone was straight (et tu, Alexander?). For such a forward-looking game (plentiful female leaders, most of whom are depicted respectfully and not as sex objects, abundance of female GPs), it would be disappointing if everyone was automatically straight. Even if they introduced a 5% chance that a leader with flirtatious agenda turned out to be gay, I would be happy.
Of course, the inevitable uproar when "WTH TEDDY ROOSEVELT IS GAY FOR POUNDMAKER, SJWS RUIN EVERYTHING"
...i don't know if my heart could handle that.