Is this about the hypothetical Nemesis Object ?
Whatever it is, it can't be a black hole of any kind. A "small" black hole wouldn't have the mass to sustain itself and would quickly "evaporate" into radiation.
One hypothesis is that it might be a brown dwarf which is a huge gas giant that isn't quite large enough to be a star because it can't generate enough gravitational pressure for nuclear fusion to occur.
Yes, it is this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_Nine, which has garnered considerable steam in popular science clickbait, lately.
I don't know that I agree the statement, that " A "small" black hole wouldn't have the mass to sustain itself and would quickly "evaporate" into radiation. " , because we'd need to first define "quickly", and we would need to argue it's in a vacuum without potential "fuel". It very well might be sustaining itself with material from the Oort cloud. How apparent would be an accretion disk of an object the size of a basketball, but with the mass of 10 Earths? It would probably, I'd think, "look like" a "dark spot" in spacetime, roughly the size of a planet with the mass of 10 Earths.
I appreciate your answer, and I know the general consensus is that it's a planet (ish?) object. I just have this image of a stellar "explosion" of our sun's binary companion which released much of the mass now transiting sol, billions of years ago, which coalesced to the formation of what we see today. The "remnant" of that reaction, a small "black hole" still persists on the outer edge of the sun's gravity. All the planetary, asteroid, comet "chunks",
are also the result of that event. I don't understand why that, somehow, doesn't make sense.