Yeah, since about 1492
For one to be a squatter, there has to be a rightful owner to the land being squatted on. Since the natives had no concept of land ownership prior to the European arrival, they cannot be considered rightful owners, thus, the Europeans cannot be considered squatters.
I am sure that the English would have respected Native ownership, laws, religion and civilization like they did everywhere else in the world.
You think a civilization needs a flag to have laws and customs and religion?Did those other civilizations have a flag?
You think a civilization needs a flag to have laws and customs and religion?![]()
Did those other civilizations have aflagmilitary ?
Surely after hundreds of years a squatter and his descendants turn into residents
Surely after hundreds of years a squatter and his descendants turn into residents
I've been hiding in your attic for years.Anyone with experiences in squatting property?
For one to be a squatter, there has to be a rightful owner to the land being squatted on. Since the natives had no concept of land ownership prior to the European arrival, they cannot be considered rightful owners, thus, the Europeans cannot be considered squatters.
I'm not sure that the position that indigenous nations "cannot be considered rightful owner", meaning they had no title, has ever really been legally tenable in the US. Congress wouldn't have been given the power to extinguish native title if native title never existed, Johnson vs M'Intosh wouldn't have held that the federal government had exclusive right to extinguish title, and treaties and purchases would never have been made, if the title never existed to begin with.
In Australia, we didn't have this terra nullius position overturned til a court case in 1993, but native title is part of our legal system now too. Likewise is native title recognised in Canada and New Zealand (I'm completely unfamiliar with Latin American practice).
I've been hiding in your attic for years.