Cosmos1985
King
Really? Seems something is messed up in my game then, should be on the latest SVN though. Guess I have to do a fresh re-install.
An interesting choice,but the Timurid Empire did not existed long enough (1370-1526) by my opnion.Leoreth what would you think about a Timurid civilization in Central Asia? Central Asia is always quite bare in Medieval times and Timur was a great patron of the arts (and widespread murder) and what not. Seems to me to be a decent idea for a civilization.
I agree.The Khmer and Moorish UB should be changed. In rev 417, they both replace the Aqueduct. However, the Khmer Baray only adds 1, while the Moorish Noria adds 1
, 2
and costs 40
less. (is the cheaper part because it originally was a granary?) The Noria is a more powerful version of the Baray instead of an improved Aqueduct.
I suggest improving the Khmer Baray to 2-3(just 1
is too weak IMO) and maybe removing the
from the Noria. This loss of food for the Noria can be compensated with another
or
. I also think the Noria should cost 100
, like all other Aqueducts and it replacements, instead of just 60
.
Civs don't have to be balanced...it's the whole point of historical realism.
Civs don't have to be balanced...it's the whole point of historical realism.
What about Khazars as a minor civ?
They would spawn in a time where the world is quite bare of civilizations and the location is not settled/conquered by someone until much later.
And they could offer an interesting gameplay, their state religion was judaism!
They could also respawn as the golden horde or the pechenegs, or maybe they could be a respawn of an earlier armenian civilization.
Bonci suggests them as a minor civ. Minor civs are unplayable and have no UHVs.1. Control 4% of the world's territory in 850 AD
2. Have 2 vassal states by 1000 AD
3. Be the first to adopt Free Religion
Bonci suggests them as a minor civ. Minor civs are unplayable and have no UHVs.