Term 3 Judiciary

Blackhole

They only wanted to dilute the wording so it seemed as harmless and toothless writing, in fact, they were more concerned with the dogma, the wording and the thinking in general,, they merely wanted to test it against the lawmaking in the Const and CoL as a political move in order to weaken the military reform. Yet, they failed as I worked within the mandate of the MSAV. What made the MSAV more powerful now, is that we are an organized body with several profiled ranking military leaders, and that we are so well organized that we have ready contact points with all ministries and governors, so the outcome will be a more active and functional MSAV.

Is that a real problem ?
 
Provolution said:
Blackhole

They only wanted to dilute the wording so it seemed as harmless and toothless writing, in fact, they were more concerned with the dogma, the wording and the thinking in general,, they merely wanted to test it against the lawmaking in the Const and CoL as a political move in order to weaken the military reform. Yet, they failed as I worked within the mandate of the MSAV. What made the MSAV more powerful now, is that we are an organized body with several profiled ranking military leaders, and that we are so well organized that we have ready contact points with all ministries and governors, so the outcome will be a more active and functional MSAV.

Is that a real problem ?
no its not a problem,
theres nothing in the constitution stopping you, but remember other people can post other polls and there is nothing in the constitution stopping them
 
Of course not, but these polls will be external advisory, and that is fair enough.
The reason I came out hard, was that some of the criticism came out to sabotage the reform for other reasons, like the Forbidden Palace and so on. I did not notice the FP was an issue until I had posted my polls.
 
gert-janl said:
KCCrusader, thank you very much for being in the Judiciary for 2 terms!
You proved to be a valuable colleague!
wasnt it 3 terms?
anyway we will miss you KCCrusader
 
:blush: you are right black_hole. I apologise.

I also want to thank mhcarver for serving the Judiciary last term. We will see each other in the Term 4 Courthouse.
 
Why has the last days of this term of the Judicary become so nasty? It is not the fault of the members, but certain citizens are abusing this thread to try and get their way. I think that there should have been some mod action, beside a warning to try and keep this thread back on it's focus. The exact focus of this thread is to have a look at the constitution and the CoLs and to get clarification on somethings that either do not quite spell out everything and could be a source of confusion. We must never let ourselves lose this focus because we are then not playing the game in the spirit that it is meant to be played in. After it is all a game and these threa fine gentlemen have made playing this game better for us all and I congratulate you. :goodjob:

Regards, Classical_Hero, your soon to be former Trade Deputy.
 
Provolution said:
Of course not, but these polls will be external advisory, and that is fair enough.
The reason I came out hard, was that some of the criticism came out to sabotage the reform for other reasons, like the Forbidden Palace and so on. I did not notice the FP was an issue until I had posted my polls.

Provo, let me say it again, no one is trying to take away your position, undermine your power, etc. This is a game of democracy, and as such people can freely raise questions about how dongs are conducted. You keep saying people are sabotaging your ideas, when they are not. You keep saying that people question your policies without adding any ideas of their own, perhaps questioning IS an idea.
 
I certainly hope the Term 4 Judiciary gets their courthouse in order soon, as I already have a question regarding jurisdiction.
 
Back
Top Bottom