blackheart
unenlightened
Your revered and illegal
judges, I would like to ask if there is any current law governing polls. Specifically, if it is constitution for one poll to override several previous polls.

The main irritation is that you like to JR me
0blackheart said:Can governors directly request that units stationed in their province to be upgraded or does this have to pass thru the MSAV/military ministry?
The Constitution has some things to say about polls. Article J says:blackheart said:is there any current law governing polls
The will of the people will be determined through discussion and polls,
formal or informal
First of all I need to say that I don't see why we should enhance the Judiciary's Legitimacy. It is competely legal according to our Constitution. To come to your first question; I would like to refer to article F of the Constitution. This is basically all you need.blackheart said:what is the judiciary's exact job and where do we amend the constitution to enhance the judiciary's "legitimacy"?
First off, Article L of the constitution refers to a nonexistant country "Fanatika". I propose we declare this section void (we could always change the name back to JapanaticaArticle L. The constitution, laws and standards of Fanatika can never
be contrary to the rules and regulations of the
Civfanatics forums. Moderators may veto any such
constitutional amendments, laws or standards.
2. The Minister of Foreign Affairs shall be responsible
for matters involving treaties with foreign nations,
as prescribed by law.
6. The Minister of Culture shall be responsible for the
keeping of the peace and the construction of wonders.
provo your doctrines cant become law, technically law cannot also be overturned by the WOTP, meaning your docrtines would be law for term 4 about how the military operates, the ppl will change their mind(shown many times in this DG) about what they want, and if these doctrines were law they couldnt change their opinonProvolution said:Blackheart
Thank you. And of course I am allowed to answer to those parties that attack my policies in my postings. It would be muddy if I did not mention the 3-4 people continuously trying to undermine my work with no other alternative but delay, waste of time and accusations. Write an alternative, and we will poll it. Otherwise I recommend to focus on more neglected policy areas that does not involve players and actually fails to materialize results.
Provolution said:My policies do have a base power as model plans, and as I have written countless places, these will be discussed and repolled as time gooes by. We just lacked a plan in general for the military, and now it has materialized. I am amazed that this lack has not been pointed out before, that is another question. However, I never said they were LAW, or I would have written LAW in my writings and polls, but a doctrine is a sort of documented pre-prepared plan and the reform bills are organizational plans. That some people feel overrun because we are well and thightly organized and that we have created military organizational bodies is only a means to democratize the DG.
Also, formerly, the WOTP had no influence on the conduct of war, only when to end it.
This time, the WOTP gets a say on a continuous basis. Doctrines will be rediscussed and repolled between every turnchat, but these will have a lifetime of 3 turnchats ahead, so no bickering will occur when time is critical. However, the Doctrines comprise of a conceptual base from which we can work from, so we do not have to start from scratch again and again and again. And yes, the attack you came with blackhole was unwarranted, I am still within the Const and CoL, and if I decide to give these policies the official emblem as Doctrines, Military Law and so on ,I am free to do so, as this ministry intends to be very organized and precise.