Texas Teacher Gets 5 Years For Sex With 18-Year-Old Jocks

What on earth does it have to do with anything?

How can you pass judgments on someones behaviour only on the ground of knowledge of human biology?
 
How can you pass judgments on someones behaviour only on the ground of knowledge of human biology?

Because that's the only thing that matters?
 
I for one am not a fan of double standards, and that's what some of you seem to be supporting here.

"The teacher was not taking advantage of the students, they are guys and can take care of themselves." or something to that liking, is what many of you seem to be saying.

So what if the roles were reversed? What if it was a 28 year old male teacher having sex with several 18 year old female students?

Would you be saying the same thing then? If so, then fair enough, but otherwise, stop supporting double standards.

I think statistically the odds of it being rape are higher if it were a male teacher. I don't know why, but that's simple statistics. That men tend to have more physical power is probably a big part of it.

That said "Odds" don't really matter here. Its innocent until proven guilty, and what she was proven guilty of was having sex with five students, not rape. Therefore, if it were a male with female students I'd say the same thing. She should lose her job and possibly face a fine or something similar. Jail is an absurd choice, let alone prison, for a nonviolent crime.
 
Then I suggest you read it.

I really don't know how much money you have, but I certainly could not afford to pay a courtesan for the minimum 12 hours. Even if I wanted to.

And besides, if you have to pay (and I really cannot see why any sane individual would consider this for a moment) this must mean you are keener on it than your partner(s). (Allegedly)

Or are you paying for practical knowledge?

Oh, dear, you poor thing! :cry:

What a sickly piece of work your imagination must be!
 
What all this tak about man and woman equality? There are male prostitutes for women out there. It is just that supply and demand differ vastly from female for male market but it should be legal of course as well.
 
Oh, I wasn't recommending it at all.

Why do you think it transgressive?
 
Why do you think it transgressive?
The idea of transgression is to step over your internal restrictions. Generally I am not interested in men but it may be interesting to try some youngster (who reached the local age of consent of course) for a change.
 
:dunno:

Seems to have drifted a bit into the variety of human sexual experience.

Drag it back on track, will you please?
 
Because that's the only thing that matters?
If that was true we wouldnt have any legal system, moral values neither this discussion.
I really don't know how much money you have, but I certainly could not afford to pay a courtesan for the minimum 12 hours. Even if I wanted to.
As far as I know you need loving partner for tantra not a hooker. I admit I didnt read the article but this has caught my attention:
Sexual rites of Vamamarga may have emerged from early Hindu Tantra as a practical means of catalyzing biochemical transformations in the body to facilitate heightened states of awareness.
 
You see, I really can't see much point in a 15 minute session with a hooker. Not that I know what such a thing would be like. Not that I have anything against hookers as people. In the same sort of way that I haven't anything against arms manufacturers as people. I just think they're in the wrong kind of trade.
 
You see, I really can't see much point in a 15 minute session with a hooker. Not that I know what such a thing would be like. Not that I have anything against hookers as people. In the same sort of way that I haven't anything against arms manufacturers as people. I just think they're in the wrong kind of trade.

The point is that not everybody has the same standard. Sexual impulse is the instrument of procreation. Morality demands partial control of it. Spirituality complete one.
 
You see, I really can't see much point in a 15 minute session with a hooker. Not that I know what such a thing would be like.
I agree with you and usually pick a girl for a night or at least several hours if I decide to spend some money to this activity.
 
And you pay?

Are you quite quite mad?

Or are you just useless at it? And you have no choice, I suppose. That's very sad.
 
And you pay?
Are you quite quite mad?
Or are you just useless at it? And you have no choice, I suppose. That's very sad.
There are a lot of situations when on does not want or does not have opportunity to instigate one of females around for sex for free. For example, if you are going to business or tourist trip into another country it is much more easier to pick a girl for money then to investigate time for searching and seducing a decent female.

At the other side, most of girls you can get for free are amateurs in a ways how to please a man (it is true for the most prostitutes as well but they are ready to try at least). If you want a decent service it maybe worth to spend a money for a woman who can provide high-quality enjoyment. You also should keep in mind that many woman do not want to practice certain forms of sex, pros are here to provide it.

You also should consider that if one choose a free route one had to often follow a lot of archaic rites (for which a sane man may have no desire at the given moment) or lower his standards considerably.

But I agree with you in that regard it does not worth as a way for regular relieving of sexual urges. It is ok sometimes as a way to expand your experience, but for regular solution personally I would recommend either to get a girlfriend or to buy a special device made by modern sex industry - both ways have pro et contras.
 
And you pay?

Are you quite quite mad?

Or are you just useless at it? And you have no choice, I suppose. That's very sad.

You mean he should just rape her?
 
Back
Top Bottom