I'm very curious as to how you have superior alternatives to a pentagram when it comes to summoning and hexes.
You can summon the golden ratio demon, using the pentagram:from my observations, pentagrams are a bit overused when it comes to summoning and even hexing rituals. there are viable, and sometimes superior alternatives to explore
*tries it, Captain Kirk is summoned*With the black section and background all I see is s star trek badge.
Back you gold-clad sex demon!
just need to be creative and experiment. granted, not all experiments succeedI'm very curious as to how you have superior alternatives to a pentagram when it comes to summoning and hexes.
I am not convinced, in much the same way as the mechanical loom did not mean the end for making clothes by hand. Sure, it may mean that most art is produced by machine, just like most clothes are made by machine, but that really means that we can all have as much art as we want. Those who currently can afford human produced art will still be able to afford it, and it seems likely that some of them at least will still want it (just as many still want hand made clothes). It really means that everyone can now have the art they want without having to pay lots of money.This black magic is the end for traditional painting.
I'd be of that view too, but even cheap (free) AI painting can easily resemble any style you feed it with. I recall, for example, various images "drawn" in the style of Paul Klee, in a few seconds...I am not convinced, in much the same way as the mechanical loom did not mean the end for making clothes by hand. Sure, it may mean that most art is produced by machine, just like most clothes are made by machine, but that really means that we can all have as much art as we want. Those who currently can afford human produced art will still be able to afford it, and it seems likely that some of them at least will still want it (just as many still want hand made clothes). It really means that everyone can now have the art they want without having to pay lots of money.
Any art student could probably replicate the style of Paul Klee, but people still pay loads of money for the real thing. I do not see that changing with machine produced art.I'd be of that view too, but even cheap (free) AI painting can easily resemble any style you feed it with. I recall, for example, various images "drawn" in the style of Paul Klee, in a few seconds...
Still, you'd need humans to create new styles - which then can be fed to the machine.
I am of the view that in decorative art (such as painting) you will see machines (obviously not by conscious design nor serendipity, but due to calculating an analogue to them of the art) actually be indistinguishable from the human creator.Any art student could probably replicate the style of Paul Klee, but people still pay loads of money for the real thing. I do not see that changing with machine produced art.
When people pay for fine art, they are not paying for the technical ability to put paint on a canvas in the right place, they are paying for the original creativity of the artist. Until machines can have that creative spark I do not see them out competing people like Paul Klee. When they do, we shall really have to revisit the sentience question.
I am quite sure that a machine could make something that I could not distinguish from human produced, but if it can fool experts you have to wonder what value are artists providing?I am of the view that in decorative art (such as painting) you will see machines (obviously not by conscious design nor serendipity, but due to calculating an analogue to them of the art) actually be indistinguishable from the human creator.
It'd still be difficult for an art student (or other artist) to manage to fool many by presenting own work as a supposed "lost Klee masterpiece" - but a machine possibly already can do it, or will in the near future.