VermelhoRed
Prince
This atlas looks great!! But maybe you should have Carthage in Iberic Peninsula too. I don't remember their city list but Cartagena and Gades are among the first cities, and they're all in Spain.
To whoever brought this back to the top, thanks. Was looking for this everywhere and couldn't seem to find it
Uhmmm, The place in which some of the countries are put is kinda arbitrary. Rome is the worst case, with nowadays Italy's borders
But it is a good work![]()
But first, a disclaimer: These maps are not intended to be accurate. For instance, they don't show most great empires - such as the Mongol or the Roman - at their greatest extent. That would be impractical to drawn and ugly to look at.
Please refer to the disclaimer from the original post:
It might be fun to make a pink & blue map to show the geographical distribution of land by the gender of the leader. With Catherine and Wu, the world might be surprisingly pink.
Damn that map is Eurocentric. Half of all civs are all being smashed into one another in Europe and the rest is mostly blank. (Beside Asia.)
Cahokia and Singapore are currently misspelled on the map. And I'd have to check, but didn't they use the spelling "Marrakech" in the game? (Though we have reason to think that won't be a City-State much longer.)
Iroquois territory should contain Montreal as well, as it is one of the cities in the Iroquois city list.
Thanks! I've spotted a few mistakes myself, let's wait for a better reason to update it and maybe Marrakech won't be a problem anymore![]()
Iroquois' borders are always trouble, specially because the map template missed the Ontario lake... I'll see what I can do.
A map like this already exists in another thread but I think it's not updated to BNW.Thinking about it, how about a map with only the Civs' capitals, alongside the one of civs' rough territorial range?
3. Lahore is in Pakistan, as well as in India's city list. Perhaps India's boundaries can be extended to the Indus River, but as horizontal stripes.
First of all, great work on the maps! They look awesome!
There have been various people saying that some civilizations have their borders wrong (usually limited by their modern ones), and while that is true, if we made every single one of those represent their historical borders, the map would simply be too confusing to understand (just in Europe, everything would be stripes, specially considering the area the Roman Empire covered). Heck, Mesopotamia is already crowded, as it is.
The only way I can see to solve this issue (while still being readable) would be to makes various maps of different time periods - that way, there wouldn't be (as much) overlap, and we could actually see the extent of everyone's borders without too much problem. This would actually make showing the colonies viable too.
Then you could join them together in a neat "little" .GIF!
I am aware, however, of the work this would entail, and considering the limitations, I think it works great as it stands.![]()