Markus6 said:I voted "I like it, and I'm Christian." Mainly because I don't want people to think I disapprove or have a problem with it. It's a book, people can write what they want. That said it wasn't a great book and the underlining "Jesus has a surviving bloodline" conspiracy isn't exactly original. I remember it being a page turner but mainly because I had to read it fast because my mate wanted it back. I have to hand it to Dan Brown though, he has milked the controversy very well, the "Facts" section at the front was genius from that point of view.
sysyphus said:I'm agnostic and I think that this is just another hackneyed blockbuster getting more attention than it deserves.
sysyphus said:Nevermind the documentary starring Balderick.
The Last Conformist said:Pseudo-garbage? It pretends to be garbage, but actually isn't?
The two are mutually exclusive of course...Perfection said:But it has Tom Hanks!
How can Tom Hanks be in a bad movie?![]()
Apology accepted, but please pay attention to spelling - it's "pseudo", with the 'e' and the 'u' in that order.Truronian said:Apologies, I have a tendancy to make up psuedo-words, and psuedo is far to cool a term to ignore.![]()
The Last Conformist said:Apology accepted, but please pay attention to spelling - it's "pseudo", with the 'e' and the 'u' in that order.![]()
Wilson could tell you.Perfection said:But it has Tom Hanks!
How can Tom Hanks be in a bad movie?![]()
Elrohir said:Wilson could tell you.