Zardnaar
Deity
I have started this thread separate from the Corona virus thread to discuss the economic impacts.
None of us can reliably predict how things will go. Our government has point blank said there's gonna be a recession and is increasing benefits and a wage subsidy.
I'm not an economist but I have a history degree and have studied basic economic s along with the war economies if WW2. I've also worked on farms, ports, and logistics firms while my wife works in logistics as well.
I probably have an above average practical experience if how stuff gets from A to B and how it's produced.
I suspect things are not to different internationally except that some European countries are more efficient.
Our government is adopting a Keynesian approach to keeping the lights on. I've seen some idiots online complain about the government bailing out airlines to the tune of 80 billion dollars instead of helping the people.
If they helped the people each US citizen would get around $250 to panic buy toilet paper with. 80 billion to airlines keeps them running.
That's important because a lot of cargo went by air. This includes medicine which is important right now.
If they gave the money to the people it's a short term fix, if the airlines to under the money can't be spent anyway as there's no goods.
In WW2 terms airlines are a strategic industry. Shipping and trucking would also be important.
Personally I like the way our government has handled it. Yes business get money via the government but it's conditional on wages. The companies can't really fire everyone after free govenment money.
The intention is to keep people working with reliable income. This also keeps them spending. Up to a point. The economy is gonna take a hit. People on welfare also spend money. This is good more money spent is good.
In the war years rationing was introduced. This is to prevent panic buying and to make sure everyone got a fair share.
A side effect of rationing was for the poor in some countries such as Germany and the UK it improved their diet although later in the war German rations were cut. Wages went up in the war years apparently doubling in the US. Baby boomers exist because the parents could afford to have kids.
The UK government also worked out what the most efficient crops were in terms of calories. The USA infamously had generous rationing, the Soviets the least.
Some of you also saw me opposed to the UBI Yang liked. This wasn't because I'm opposed to the government giving out money but it doesn't go to who needs it the most.
Our welfare and pension system are more than the UBI and the wage subsidy is almost double the UBI. Middle and upper class people don't need it.
Even if things go really pear shaped economic activity continues even in the Great Depression.
None of us can reliably predict how things will go. Our government has point blank said there's gonna be a recession and is increasing benefits and a wage subsidy.
I'm not an economist but I have a history degree and have studied basic economic s along with the war economies if WW2. I've also worked on farms, ports, and logistics firms while my wife works in logistics as well.
I probably have an above average practical experience if how stuff gets from A to B and how it's produced.
I suspect things are not to different internationally except that some European countries are more efficient.
Our government is adopting a Keynesian approach to keeping the lights on. I've seen some idiots online complain about the government bailing out airlines to the tune of 80 billion dollars instead of helping the people.
If they helped the people each US citizen would get around $250 to panic buy toilet paper with. 80 billion to airlines keeps them running.
That's important because a lot of cargo went by air. This includes medicine which is important right now.
If they gave the money to the people it's a short term fix, if the airlines to under the money can't be spent anyway as there's no goods.
In WW2 terms airlines are a strategic industry. Shipping and trucking would also be important.
Personally I like the way our government has handled it. Yes business get money via the government but it's conditional on wages. The companies can't really fire everyone after free govenment money.
The intention is to keep people working with reliable income. This also keeps them spending. Up to a point. The economy is gonna take a hit. People on welfare also spend money. This is good more money spent is good.
In the war years rationing was introduced. This is to prevent panic buying and to make sure everyone got a fair share.
A side effect of rationing was for the poor in some countries such as Germany and the UK it improved their diet although later in the war German rations were cut. Wages went up in the war years apparently doubling in the US. Baby boomers exist because the parents could afford to have kids.
The UK government also worked out what the most efficient crops were in terms of calories. The USA infamously had generous rationing, the Soviets the least.
Some of you also saw me opposed to the UBI Yang liked. This wasn't because I'm opposed to the government giving out money but it doesn't go to who needs it the most.
Our welfare and pension system are more than the UBI and the wage subsidy is almost double the UBI. Middle and upper class people don't need it.
Even if things go really pear shaped economic activity continues even in the Great Depression.