The Libertarian party

I would counter-argue that there should be at least one place in the world that embraces that kind of economic philosophy.

Hong Kong was pretty close there for a while, dont know how the commies have screwed it up yet.
 
I would counter-argue that there should be at least one place in the world that embraces that kind of economic philosophy.

Pah, it's impossible to have a completely free market.
 
Actually, there are many Libertarian utopias. There was Somalia, Congo, Afghanistan just to name a few. For some reason there wasn't any huge stampede of American libertarians to travel there and enjoy the untrammelled liberty of unlimited freedom.

How does one have so much knowledge of Islam and Muslim countries and be so ignorant of libertarianism?
 
How does one have so much knowledge of Islam and Muslim countries and be so ignorant of libertarianism?

Anarcho-capitalism is pretty much what libertarianism tries to be.
 
countries run by a patchwork of warlords or the Taliban aint libertarianism or anarcho-capitalism.

That's precisely what it would be. :p
 
The (R) next to his name is symbolic only. His views are Libertarian.

Somehow I dont think so. I think Ron Paul truly understands the only way to legitimize parts of the Libertarian agenda are to make them part of the Republican agenda. I think thats what he is trying to do. And fwiw, he actually raised a good bit of money and got more electoral votes than many of the other, more mainstream, republican candidates.

Hell, republicans can register as democrats and vote in the democratic primaries, that doesn't make them democrat.

It does for the purpose of that vote.

The republican party is just a means to an end for Ron Paul. He views are strictly libertarian.

And what if he is successful in making some of the Libertarian issues, republican issues? What if the republicans end up embracing a few of his ideas?
 
Libertarianism only appears when people are rich and stupid.

You get something similar when people are poor, but there you get armed gangs, corruption, crime and warlords as well. People don't want to call it 'Libertarianism' then for some reason.

There's a reason we have governments, armies and police forces: you can't trust other people to behave.
 
Libertarianism only appears when people are rich and stupid.

You get something similar when people are poor, but there you get armed gangs, corruption, crime and warlords as well. People don't want to call it 'Libertarianism' then for some reason.

There's a reason we have governments, armies and police forces: you can't trust other people to behave.

Libertarians believe in a hard criminal justice system. People who abuse their power should be delt with harshly.
 
Berserker: you've heard of the Triads right? Hong Kong is famous for it's organised crime.

Al: but they're the ones in control...
 
Libertarianism only appears when people are rich and stupid.

Yer own little paradox to solve

You get something similar when people are poor, but there you get armed gangs, corruption, crime and warlords as well. People don't want to call it 'Libertarianism' then for some reason.

Because libertarianism values the protection of private property, these "systems" dont. Libertarianism protects the minority from the majority and you're claiming here that libertarianism is mob rule. :crazyeye: Try reading the people who gave us the Declaration of Independence and Constitution. Aside from slavery this was a libertarian country for quite a while...

There's a reason we have governments, armies and police forces: you can't trust other people to behave.

But you can trust em with government :goodjob: According to our Founding documents we have our government to protect life, liberty and property - not "re-distribute wealth" based on some left winger's notion of "fairness".
 
And what mechanism does Libertarianism use to support the protection of private property?

Redistribution is protection of life.
 
As I've said elsewhere, libertarians come in 3 types:

Mushy headed idealists

Know nothings

Predators.

The irony being that the mush heads and know nothings don't believe that the predators exist, so they expend all their energy making certain the obstacles the predators might face in reaching their prey are removed.

Just out of curiosity, which of your three classifications do you think I fall into?

Actually, there are many Libertarian utopias. There was Somalia, Congo, Afghanistan just to name a few. For some reason there wasn't any huge stampede of American libertarians to travel there and enjoy the untrammelled liberty of unlimited freedom.

Did any of those three have a democratic government powerful enough to consistently enforce the laws and maintain a coherent legal system?


And folks, there is a Libertarian Party and a Republican Party. There's a libertarian ideology and a conservative ideology. Please don't confuse party membership with ideology, it makes baby Jesus cry.
 
Before the Commies, it was about the most libertarian economic system on the planet.

yeah, it has an essential role in the friedmanian mythology, but its a complete fabrication. Hong Kong always had pretty extensive state role in housing, education, land and healthcare. Also, Hong Kong had many advantages, like foreign provided defense.

Actually, the situation is reverse. China is not communist, most of China is becoming a lot like Hong Kong. Markets with strong state interference, protectionism like tariffs and currency manipulation, and so forth.
 
Back
Top Bottom