Synobun
Deity
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2006
- Messages
- 24,884
If I recall, Canada successfully repulsed every attempted US invasion in that war.
Don't worry about the details.
If I recall, Canada successfully repulsed every attempted US invasion in that war.
If I recall, Canada successfully repulsed every attempted US invasion in that war.
That's just another argument in the "PRO" column for forced annexation of Canada.
Whether this is correct or not, I don't know. But I've not found anything about them devastating the ecosystem, and no sign of a BBC documentary on the subject, yet.The reintroduction of wolves has reportedly increased biodiversity within Yellowstone National Park. Along with (and partly because of) an increase in new-growth vegetation, such as aspen and willow trees, which has resulted from the reduction in elk numbers. The aspen and willow were able to recover because not only was the elk population reduced because of predation due to the wolves, but they quit venturing as deep into thickets due to the fear of being attacked by wolves in an area of very low visibility. This process of top predators regulating the lower sections of the trophic pyramid was dubbed, "the ecology of fear" by William J. Ripple and Robert L. Bestcha[9] In addition to the restoration of vegetation several important species such as the beaver (which had also become extinct from the park) and red fox have also recovered, probably due to the wolves keeping coyote populations under control
Is it true that when wolves were reintroduced to Yellowstone they completely destroyed the ecosystem there?
What I read and heard was that there was a problem with a species, I think elk, that was so numerous that they had caused damage to the plants and land, and nothing else could grow, so wolves were reintroduce, keeping the numbers of elk in check, leading to all the other plants and animals to recover. Then I was told I was wrong, because a BBC documentary said that the wolves destroyed everything, with only beavers being the only other living thing to benefit.
How does reintroducing a keystone species threaten to destroy an environment that it's absence is destroying? Honest question.
Is your source by chance sponsored by a rancher's association?
Oh no. No no no no.He made it sound like Yellowstone was doing well without the wolves.
You were told by someone who is a liar.I was told by someone who claims it was shown in a BBC documentary about Yellowstone.
The wolf's return has restored the natural balance of Yellowstone: elk no longer graze along the river banks, leaving more willow saplings for beavers
That's not a source. What was the name of the documentary?
You were told by someone who is a liar.![]()