The very many questions-not-worth-their-own-thread question thread XXXI

Status
Not open for further replies.
You should tell yourself that you will "probably play it again someday" and not attach any significance to any particular play.

Speaking of which, maybe I should install Civ III and give that a whirl...

The thing is that I know I won't play Civ V again once I have Civ VI.

Here's how I know. When Civ V came out, I was playing Civ III (just sort of missed out on Civ IV). I loved Civ III. If I'd never taken up Civ V, I'd still happily be playing Civ III. But as soon as I got involved in Civ V, I had no interest in going back to Civ III. I was conscious that I'd have to bring back to mind all my strategies, all my tech paths, etc. I had zero interest in doing so.

So I know almost to a certainty that once I get involved in discovering the strategies of Civ VI, I'll similarly have no interest in going back to Civ V. So I know that the last game of Civ V before I buy Civ VI will be my last game of Civ V ever.
 
I'm not a multi-player guy, but I did okay at Civ III back in its day...which wasn't really that long ago. I didn't get Civ IV until Civ V was already out...and I had it for most of a year before I installed it. If I hadn't rebuilt my machine and faced "reinstall III or is it time to open this package?" which is a pretty silly question to face I might still be playing Civ III.
 
Are you allowed to fly with a razor in your hand luggage? (within EU, that might matter)
I mean this 4-bladed wet shaving razors, not a shaving knife or something ^^ (to be clear: picture http://globe-views.com/dcim/dreams/razor/razor-05.jpg ).
The information online is a bit inconclusive, saying it depends on the airline. Doesn't make sense to me o_O, because the check is at the security and I don't think they care about which airline you fly.
 
Don't risk it. Just buy a cheap disposable one for a euro or two on the other end of your journey.

That's the kind of item you can't be 100% sure won't get thrown away by security until you're at the check point.
 
I played some civ3 in 2015 and couldn't believe how easy it was after 4 and 5. The AI is hilariously obvious. I was letting my cities fall into disorder and wasting potential with over production and could still hack it on demi-god. Still fun though.
 
Ok Civ....
I loaded Civ. V vanilla
Which DLC do I need to buy, BNW or do I also need G&K too so I get all the religions and things
I finally think it might be ready to play as Civ. VI is out and that just won.t run on my laptop properly and I can play on Deity with Civ. IV on most mods with giant Earth maps
Now over to the rants thread as I asked in the Civ. V sticky quickie questions thread.... 5 days ago
 
Last edited:
Ok Civ....
I loaded Civ. V vanilla
Which DLC do I need to buy, BNW or do I also need the G&K DLC too to get all the religions
I finally think it might be ready to play as Civ. VI is out and can play on Deity on most mods in Civ. IV
now over to the rants thread as I asked on the Civ. V quickie questions thread .... 5 days ago!!!

Buying the Gold upgrade is probably cheaper. AFAIK gameplay features added in G&K are also in BNW, but you won't get the civs or scenarios from G&K if you don't get it or the Gold upgrade.
 
Buying the Gold upgrade is probably cheaper. AFAIK gameplay features added in G&K are also in BNW, but you won't get the civs or scenarios from G&K if you don't get it or the Gold upgrade.
Thanks very much for such a prompt answer :D
the Aussie dollar is low and being a cheapskate didn't want to rebuy vanilla which I brought the day of release
 
Thanks very much for such a prompt answer :D
the Aussie dollar is low and being a cheapskate didn't want to rebuy vanilla which I brought the day of release

Luckily, Steam now discounts the games you already have from the bundles. For example, I got Civ 5 Gold a few years ago but there are a couple extra DLCs I didn't get in that. The Complete bundle has 16 DLCs in it, and since I already have 14 purchasing that bundle would cost me $3.62 (map packs). If you can wait, Civ 5 will undoubtedly go on sale for at least 66% off in the summer.
 
I played some civ3 in 2015 and couldn't believe how easy it was after 4 and 5. The AI is hilariously obvious. I was letting my cities fall into disorder and wasting potential with over production and could still hack it on demi-god. Still fun though.
:scan:
And if you're tough enough we will let you play against us lads from the multiplayer fora.
QFT, dude.
 
We need a replacement for an AI faction…
 
To the extroverts on here: how exactly do you engage girls (or even guys) in several hours of conversation? I see this happening all the time, but I've never been able to reach the five minute mark.
 
I can be absolutely horrible at small talk. But if there's a natural topic I'm ok I guess. Depends on my co-talker. If it's a fellow poor small-talker, the conversation be crammed with awkward silences. But women are generally better at talking than men.
 
It's not awkwardness I'm concerned about, it's what you could possibly fill hours of conversation with.
 
It has nothing to do with being extroverted. At most, extroversion and introversion impact the surface level interactions between people. Introverts are typically not great at small talk and crowds unless they fake it, and the side effect of faking it is that it's exhaustive and you want to bail ASAP throughout the entire interaction.

A deep conversation with a woman in private would be more aligned with an introvert's interests than an extrovert's if we're boiling down social interaction to such a black and white dichotomy.

Try talking about things that matter to you. These hours-in-the-night discussions aren't about inane things like the weather and the results of the latest sportsball game. It's easy to talk for hours if your partner shares your interest in a subject. You've put days into talking to us. Just pretend the girl is someone you disagree with on CFC.
 
To the extroverts on here: how exactly do you engage girls (or even guys) in several hours of conversation? I see this happening all the time, but I've never been able to reach the five minute mark.

Ask them about who they are and what they're interested in. Ask them questions about those interests. Try to match your level of discourse to them and how deep they're willing to go on the topic. Listen to their answers and ask follow-up questions. When they ask you about your interests, be earnest, but stay in-tune to their reactions/mood. Don't push if you're losing your audience and try not to gush. If you have a strong opinion on something, it's fine to assert it. But don't be a dick about it. The cliché'd advice is just to let the girl do all the talking, but this is bad (and sexist!) advice. People who sit back and go "uh-huh" a lot are not memorable and you won't find yourself getting very far in the dating scene doing that. You want to make an impression on her. Keep in mind that you can just as easily do that by asking really good, interesting questions, as you can by blathering about cool stories about you or whatever.

Mostly just pay attention to the person you're talking to and adjust topics/mode of discourse according to how your audience is responding.

Or you can just flip the script. Someone with whom you find you have a hard time carrying on a conversation for 10 minutes is probably not going to make for a very good romantic partner. You should be looking for someone with whom you can chat for hours on end without even thinking about it. Honestly? The hardest thing about dating is discerning between when a connection is a real, natural, and strong one; and when it's just the that the two of you were particularly on your game that night.
 
Last edited:
Try talking about things that matter to you. These hours-in-the-night discussions aren't about inane things like the weather and the results of the latest sportsball game. It's easy to talk for hours if your partner shares your interest in a subject. You've put days into talking to us. Just pretend the girl is someone you disagree with on CFC.

That's the worst advice imaginable. I usually go on CFC when I need advice or to argue politics. I can pick and choose a discussion, insert myself precisely where I want to be and also have as much time as I want to make responses.

Just look my entry to this thread here (the very last post). Is that how you recall meeting your girlfriend? Information-dumping about obscure topics?

Ask them about who they are and what they're interested in. Ask them questions about those interests.

What does that mean? I can never get out of 'interview mode' and so I run out of things to say very quickly.

Try to match your level of discourse to them and how deep they're willing to go on the topic. Listen to their answers and ask follow-up questions. When they ask you about your interests, be earnest, but stay in-tune to their reactions/mood. Don't push if you're losing your audience and try not to gush. If you have a strong opinion on something, it's fine to assert it. But don't be a dick about it. The cliché'd advice is just to let the girl do all the talking, but this is bad (and sexist!) advice.

Funny, girls hardly seem to ever say anything to me. I don't think I'm ugly and I don't have a weird hairstyle or clothes, so clearly something about my personality is putting them off.

People who sit back and go "uh-huh" a lot are not memorable and you won't find yourself getting very far in the dating scene doing that.

My first conversation with my recent... crush... had me doing all the talking. I know this and it isn't helping.

You want to make an impression on her. Keep in mind that you can just as easily do that by asking really good, interesting questions, as you can by blathering about cool stories about you or whatever.

I have no idea what you mean by good or interesting. I asked a girl what she was studying psychology for, and she said she was considering being a therapist. What would I say to keep the conversation going? I don't know anything about psychology or therapy and thus can't commentate in any meaningful way.

Mostly just pay attention to the person you're talking to and adjust topics/mode of discourse according to how your audience is responding.

There's literally no advice here, dude. You might as well say "spin the pedals clockwise with your feet" to teach me how to ride a bike.

Or you can just flip the script. Someone with whom you find you have a hard time carrying on a conversation for 10 minutes is probably not going to make for a very good romantic partner. You should be looking for someone with whom you can chat for hours on end without even thinking about it.

i.e. you'll be alone forever because no one is compatible with you. (I know that's not what you mean but it's clearly a corollary of this.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom