Aphex_Twin
Evergreen
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2002
- Messages
- 7,474
I don't know much about the state of global warming science, but I am baffled by a number of common popular interpretations. Namely, that global warming explains the phenomena:
1. Year X was warmer than the average.
2. The exact hurricane/tropical storm Y.
3. Area Z encountered a drought.
...
Maybe I have the wrong informations, but I thought weather data was quite variable from year to year. In order to get a long term pattern, you need long term data. No particular weather event can be tied to a wholesome climate pattern, at best, it can be assigned a probability.
I'm also wondering what can be deduced from geologically short time periods (decades) with regard to global climate patterns.
Everything appears to be enmeshed in a slurry of partial truths, lies and innuendo. Few parts involved in the debate seem to have a genuine interest in the science, rather than money, populism and political favors.
So what do you think and what do you know?
1. Year X was warmer than the average.
2. The exact hurricane/tropical storm Y.
3. Area Z encountered a drought.
...
Maybe I have the wrong informations, but I thought weather data was quite variable from year to year. In order to get a long term pattern, you need long term data. No particular weather event can be tied to a wholesome climate pattern, at best, it can be assigned a probability.
I'm also wondering what can be deduced from geologically short time periods (decades) with regard to global climate patterns.
Everything appears to be enmeshed in a slurry of partial truths, lies and innuendo. Few parts involved in the debate seem to have a genuine interest in the science, rather than money, populism and political favors.
So what do you think and what do you know?