Tintin: The Movie(s)

The second review wasn't a review, though, it was a personal reaction to the film. They'd already published a proper review - which was the first one I linked to.

What's the difference? In practice, it's hard to draw clear boundaries between proper reviews and personal reactions.

The film is in 3D which many film goers and film reviewers believe is a very unsatisfactory format.
http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2011/01/post_4.html

Ebert is an artistic reactionary, a veritable old fart who has quite a bit of trouble accommodating media he's not used to. It's been shown pretty clearly in his comments about video games.
 
I can't believe I haven't seen this thread until now.

Regarding the second review, frankly, I have little sympathy for its complaints about the transition between media. "Boohoo, films don't give you the time and space to follow the story and appreciate the art at your own pace. It's a travesty to art and literature!" I can't decide whether this is fanboyism gone mad or just typical bourgeois-like reaction to the violation of his sacred medium.

And I find the conjectures about the "deeper, darker signals" in the books a bit wacky and at best interesting but quite irrelevant. So that leaves the last few paragraphs. Those bring up a few points worth worrying about, but that's a rather poor review overall.

I tend to agree. Books are books; films are films. Some people enjoy both, for different reasons.
 
Yesterday, the movie premiere took place in Brussels, in the presence of Steven Spielberg.
It was almost like a visit from a foreign had of state: security everywhere, Spielberg was welcomed by a couple of government ministers, and he even got a special medal from them...
All in all, the movie seems to have been well received. The general consensus is that Spielberg and Jackson took good care of one of our (few) national symbols :)
 
Anyone caught it yet? I really enjoyed it. I especially love the Moroccan scenes with the pretty port city. I don't think anyone really behaved out of character, so I don't understand why there's a fuss about that.
 
Doesn't come out here until December 21.
 
SO stoked to see this movie when it comes out! You should hear me in theaters when the trailer comes on...or maybe you don't want to! :lol:
 
Seen it (Paramount decided that releasing it twelve days ahead in Quebec would be a good strategy for hype-building, since Quebec, being French, is in the Tintin Fans world).

Reaction is: loved it. It's a very solid hybrid of several stories

Spoiler :
The opening is from unicorn, then they move in the plot twists of Crab with the Golden claw, all the way until they get to the Morrocan city, where we move into largely a brand new climax (you could argue for a loose inspiration from Calculus Affair...), before they move to the conclusion of Treasure (yes, they get the treasure in the globe in the caves of Marlinspike in this one...but the twist is, that's only a fraction of Rackham's treasure, with the rest of it still allegedly sleeping where the Unicorn sank. Cue Rackham-based sequel, and I wouldn't be surprised if elements of Prisoners of the Sun (the other treasure-centric Tintin book) end up coming into play.


Their version of the characters are generaly good. Of the series mainstay who appear in this one (Tintin, Haddock, the Thom(p)son, Snowy, (Unnamed Surprise), and Nestor...well, I'd say the Thom(p)son are the only two I didn't quite feel. They were good, but they didn't quite fit the Thom(p)son I remember from my book. Maybe as simply as in the graphic design.

(Unnamed Surprise Appearance, for those who have not spoiled themselves) is also very, very, very much as imagined. And the use to which the character is put fit into the plot, and fit with the character. Though the character's trademark quote is missing in the french version, sadly.

Tintin took some getting used to, but eventually started working. He's good, though not particularly amazing.

Haddock isn't so much an acceptable Haddock or a good Haddock...just plain, he's Haddock. THE Haddock, even, at least as far as screen adaptation of the character go. Whatever hesitation I had about the film flew out the (ship's) window when we first heard his drunk singing (through the aforesaid window). One specific joke aside, he is as close to perfect as could be. And since Haddock has always been the chief interesting character in the Tintin series, and doubly so in both Crabs and Unicorn, that means he pretty much carry the whole thing on his back...and does it well.

Snowy was pretty good too, and played his role to perfection.

And all the sight gags of previous album (down to and including a Lake of the Sharks reference!)in the opening animation were a great way to show "We know what our source material is, and we respect it." As is the very opening scene.

They're playing up the treasure hunt/Indiana Jones angle. I'm curious which of the other books will be used for the rest of the trilogy now.

I mean, beyond the obvious one that's set up at the end of this one.

There aren't that many books set up around that sort of concept in Tintin. There's Unicorn (already used), Red Rackham (duh), kind-of Prisoners of the Sun...elements of Flight 714, maybe? I don't know. And I don'T think we'll see the more political or scientifically outdated (ie, Moon, as wonderful as it was, wouldn't be nearly as interesting to do in the post-Appolo world albums).
 
They're playing up the treasure hunt/Indiana Jones angle. I'm curious which of the other books will be used for the rest of the trilogy now.

I mean, beyond the obvious one that's set up at the end of this one.

There aren't that many books set up around that sort of concept in Tintin. There's Unicorn (already used), Red Rackham (duh), kind-of Prisoners of the Sun...elements of Flight 714, maybe? I don't know. And I don'T think we'll see the more political or scientifically outdated (ie, Moon, as wonderful as it was, wouldn't be nearly as interesting to do in the post-Appolo world albums).

The next movie is supposed to be based on The Calculus Affair
 
Nooo, the next one will be the first part of The Treasure and... oh, Andy Serkis was great. When will such genius be awarded an Academy Award he deserved for Gollum (and for THE HADDOCK)?
 
Back
Top Bottom