To explain capitalism

[Terxpahseyton]

I have no clue what you are talking about then.

Yeah right. It is on ME to point out that by three factors I did not mean actually two factors resulting in a third factor. Which is quite nicely reflected in what you linked to by being broken drown in different stages of two-point-problems (because you can not solve an actual three-point-one)

I attempted to look it up as you asked me to but I found nothing relevant. I would suggest that you actually provide links that describe this important mathematical proof.

You can not proof that there is nothing. So no wonder you found nothing.
But surely lecturing me on mathematics using Wikipedia, you must know this.
Sorry but I am going to beat your silly ass with that.

It's a US government issued analysis that projects the effects of passing a certain healthcare bill. By having this analysis we can better understand what the results of implementing the bill would be. I suggest that as an example where economic analysis is useful for decision making.

Oh... cool. They project stuff. They make assumptions about the economic situation of people and extrapolate (yeah I do all the work I know). Were they ever right, I wonder? Like..... ONCE?
Who knows. They can extrapolate?
No I did not dispute that you can extrapolate.To extrapolate is about the most basic math you can do, beyond 1 + 1. Assume you got one brick a day. How many bricsk in 30 days is that? HURAYYY SCIENCE!
No.... Not science. That is basic math. Yes I admit economist know how to do basic math. I am glad they are paid, otherwise, WHO WOULD DO THE MATH?!
I disputed weather this tells you what economic policies to presume.
Weather more healthcare means less uninsured - a 12-year old can tell you that if you pick the right American state.

BUT what I can simply not extrapolate: When are you going to acknowledge the gist of my post?

I think I can play economist, no one is checking anyway:
Never!
Now plz pay all your money. Plz plz. I look impotent.
Er.. Important.
Okay too late.
Joke on me, as has been the case.

 

[Terxpahseyton]

Does anybody even believe that economics is an exact science?

Well a fruitful point of discussion, for once!
No of course not.
But we act like it anyway. And to understand the meaning of that. That is the trick!
You know when I talk about two-factor-system, I did not just talk about imprecions. I talked about BIAS! Did that ever penetrate your petty smarty-head? Yes?




I did not think so
But keep playing PlAYAAA

 

[Perfection]

Yeah right. It is on ME to point out that by three factors I did not mean actually two factors resulting in a third factor. Which is quite nicely reflected in what you linked to by being broken drown in different stages of two-point-problems (because you can not solve an actual three-point-one)

3 body problems may not have an exact solution, but that doesn't mean we can't make numerical predictions of arbitrary accuracy if we know the initial conditions.

Oh... cool. They project stuff. They make assumptions about the economic situation of people and extrapolate (yeah I do all the work I know). Were they ever right, I wonder? Like..... ONCE?

They did reasonably well with the ACA
http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2015/dec/cbo-crystal-ball-forecast-aca

 

[Terxpahseyton]

So is this you giving up but trying to appear not to?
Keeps talking about the 3 body problem which was never was the question to begin with...
Makes the point that extrapolation can be kinda right. Uhhhhhh.... I guess my whole point was that it can NEVER BE RIGHT. That was my point, wasn't it?
That was my whole point...
Of freaking course it was not. But you do not care.

Yeah,..... Do I have to spell it out? Okay I know.... I ALWAYS have to. Again and again and again and again. And again. The thing is, as you should notice by now as my main partner of discussion - NO RESULT! NONE. You don't care. But make "points" (silly-ass-nit-picks) where it suits you.-

Oh you say. Everybody can say that! Well I can back it up. But what is the point, really? Any object follower will see it..,, I already made it--- but you have to bite into any bite you get like a rodent. But I guess you are right after all. There is no objective follower. Just punks.

Because: DID YOU EVER EVEN RESPOND TO MY MAIN POINT? THE BIAS I JUST REPEATED A POST OF MINE ABOVE?
The freaking main point?
Nope... Just nagging pointlessly.... And I am not here to shoot rats. Even if I enjoy smashing them. But it gets repetitive.

edit: To tress. My main point is where real interesting math even starts. But I guess we keep talking about mathematical problem not even at stake here and now.

Moderator Action: Warned for repeated trolling. FP
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889

 

[Perfection]

I dunno, it seems reasonable to me that if you say something is mathematically proven that you can point to a mathematical proof.

I'm trying asking this to better understand what you said, because frankly I don't understand your main point.

 

[Borachio]

Beats me. I never did understand economics. Which just seemed like so much circular reasoning to me.

Nice thread, though. I'm impressed.

 

[Flying Pig]

Moderator Action: I'm not convinced that this thread ever had a topic, but it is certainly irredeemably off it by now. Please start a new thread - with a reasonably comprehensible OP - if you wish to discuss any of the tangents arising here.