hobbsyoyo
Deity
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2012
- Messages
- 26,575
Its not always, but I've heard that it has been.
Obviously we all know an 18 year old sleeping with a 17 year old is basically just consensual sex with no "Iffiness" to it. I deliberately made it 18 and 15 so that it might be a little iffy. Even still, its "Iffy." Its not "Rape." Rape isn't "Gray" its flat out nonconsensual. That's the way I feel about legal terminology. When "Rape" can actually be "non-forcible" I think it almost cheapens the word to where we have to use words like "Legitimate rape" when we shouldn't have too.
Oh, and yes, "Forcible" can be more than just physically holding someone down. Purposely drugging someone, for instance, would apply the same way. As would sleeping with a child. I'd shoot anyone on the spot who was practicing either of the two in the process of the act in order to stop it if needed.
But drunkenness? I'd just call the cops. Yeah, its wrong, but consent is sometimes murky in that type of area.
Spoken like someone who has no firsthand knowledge of sex, drugs, alcohol, rape or the various interactions that can happen between all these things.