U.S invading and taking out Iraq's Root of Evil - wrong or right??

Should U.S invade Iraq and take out it´s "Root of Evil"?

  • Yes

    Votes: 30 42.3%
  • No

    Votes: 33 46.5%
  • Don't know

    Votes: 7 9.9%
  • Don't care

    Votes: 1 1.4%

  • Total voters
    71
I have read the artcile and I have read others claiming the secrets of the third anti-christ. I have seen documentaries on Saddam Hussien which contradict information in the press and articles such as these. It could easily be propogander. I would prefer the facts of a pschiatric report than to the rants of a collumist. I prefer facts hard, solid facts to rumor.
 
Saddam gassed his own brother for god's sake! His mom says that she wishes she would've killed him when he was born! I think that says a little bit about his personality.
And yeah the US has gone over all war scenario's MANY MANY times. And i would put my money on the US and British Armed forces than the Chinese and North Koreans....but with the help of Vietnam, Malaysia and Trinidad and Tobago they odds might swing in the Chinese's favor! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 wow.....even the Arab countries want 'So damn insane' gone.
This isn't going to be another vietnam, Vietnam was bad because there were a bunch of hippie bastards aroud who *****ed about everything.
Americans now will gladly go to the draft and fight for our country.
Pakistan and India are just bull ****ting, with the both of them with nukes they won't go to war. its the MAD factor...mutual assured destruction.
For all of you people who don't think Saddam should go just keep on thinking that and maybe we'll leave him alone so he'll gas your asses, then you can decide if he should go
 
This isn't going to be another vietnam, Vietnam was bad because there were a bunch of hippie bastards aroud who *****ed about everything.

Americans now will gladly go to the draft and fight for our country.
For all of you people who don't think Saddam should go just keep on thinking that and maybe we'll leave him alone so he'll gas your asses, then you can decide if he should go

:lol:

Are you volunteering for the marines as you type yourself, or are you just loud-mouthed?;)
 
Originally posted by SunTzu
Saddam gassed his own brother for god's sake!


No one is immune from the price of treason.
:slay:
 
Most of the posters here want the US to invade a country that;

1. has a history of invading sovereign nations, for spurious political gains.
2. has (or is rumoured to have) a large stockpile of WMD and is in the process of develping more.
3. has a history of sponsoring terrorism.
4. is led by a man many consider to be unstable.
5. is a thorn in the side of ME peace and development.
6. is considered by other nations to be untrustworthy.
7. kills thousands of it's own citizens.

Does that about cover it?
 
Originally posted by rmsharpe
If you're trying to link Saddam Hussein to Ariel Sharon or George Bush, don't.

I was just attempting to codify the pertinent points. You're the one that brought up Messrs Sharon and Bush.
 
no i'm just a loud-mouthed american :)
Now i saw we shove a daisy-cutter(or just conventional explosives)up a camels ass and ride that mofo right into saddam's palace, as a gift from Bin Laden. lol :D
 
I'd just like to give a warning to anyone that challenges me, because when I'm part of the workforce, I'll probably be the guy designing ballistic missiles for the Republican Party ;)
 
Originally posted by ozscott75


I was just attempting to codify the pertinent points. You're the one that brought up Messrs Sharon and Bush.

And if he hadn't, you would have. That was pretty transparent.
 
ozscott75, how about the fact that they unneccessarily and systematicly used WMD and that they have a history of using ballistic missiles against civilian targets in order to cause as much damage as they can and possbily create a disaster (by targeting an active nuclear reactor)?
 
Originally posted by Switch625


And if he hadn't, you would have. That was pretty transparent.
Well, i think the point is that everyone made the connection, which means everyone's on the same wavelength.
 
I have read the artcile

Apparently you haven't, or you have and didn't understand it.


and I have read others claiming the secrets of the third anti-christ.

Get real.
Your comparisons are out of place and out of context.
Do you have anything that disqualifies that certain subject/article and it's findings?

I have seen documentaries on Saddam Hussien which contradict information in the press and articles such as these.

Name them.
And, pray tell, how did they contradict THIS CERTAIN article?
And what the heck do you mean by "such as these"?

It could easily be propogander.

I doubt a long article describing the intimite life of Saddam written by a book writer is a "propagander".
Then again, even the Psychiatric report can be.

I would prefer the facts of a pschiatric report

How do you know the psychiatric report will have facts and not payed-summarizations?

than to the rants of a collumist. I prefer facts hard, solid facts to rumor.

Rants? You obviously haven't read the Article.
And it is not a column, it is a detailed watch and history of Saddam's intimite life.
Where does the rumor come in?
 
Originally posted by IceBlaZe


How do you know the psychiatric report will have facts and not payed-summarizations?


All Im going to say on this is that if you can't trust a psychiatrist who can you trust! In the same way a psychiatrist could get payed-off then so could a writter. Or am I wrong?
 
All Im going to say on this is that if you can't trust a psychiatrist who can you trust!

Exactly.

In the same way a psychiatrist could get payed-off then so could a writter. Or am I wrong?

No, you are right, and so am I.
 
Originally posted by Switch625


Anti-Christ? What? Did you actually read the article?

Yes I did read the article WHOLE. I don't see whats not to understand here. If you actually read what I wrote then you would see that I have read OTHER articles about Saddam Hussien claiming him to be the third anti-christ.
 
Originally posted by IceBlaZe
unable.jpg


:D

:lol:
 
Originally posted by IceBlaZe

No, you are right, and so am I.

Thats a refreshing attitude. Think of that post as a biggot test!:D
 
Back
Top Bottom