woody60707
Deity
Wait, so can I ask a question too?
This doesn't explain why you devote attention to a single murder in Amerika, when there are so many human rights violations going on in other parts of the world that are ignored.
"First world problems".
I agree, being murdered is a trivial 1st world problem, on a par with losing the TV remote or the bus being late.
I just assumed you were on it, but perhaps you just fantasize about warlord rape rather than taking action.This doesn't explain why you devote attention to a single murder in Amerika, when there are so many human rights violations going on in other parts of the world that are ignored.
"First world problems".
Unlike you I don't posture and claim to be championing some sort of moral ideal.
Hopefully he gets off just to piss off Trayvon's ******** supporters.
Of course, being Amerikkka, the judge will probably sentence him to further her own career and to prove that mob justice works.
I guess to elaborate on what I mean by first world problems... basically the first world has few real problems, and so the media has to manufacture problems to fill airtime. In this case they found "problem" that had lots of marketing potential due to the race factor involved and so they ran with it. This problem is nowhere near as important as problems elsewhere, but that doesn't stop the first world media's introverted audience from caring. And so we have first worlders posting their very important threads about random murder cases and celebrity news all over the internets. Not that I have a problem with that, just that I enjoy pointing out how ridiculous it all is from time to time. Carry on with George Zuckersberg - or whoever he is.
That usually happens when you paint yourself pink, dance on a harpsichord and sing: "Those moronic arguments are here again".
He killed an unarmed 17 year old boy who he confronted himself after being told by police not to do so
Angela Corey and her team of prosecutors must know something that the rest of us don't.
In order to charge George Zimmerman with second-degree murder, local defense attorneys say, there must be something showing that Zimmerman acted with a "depraved mind" when he shot Trayvon Martin. And, to negate a defense under Florida's "stand your ground" law, there must be evidence that Zimmerman attacked Martin first.
"I don't think she can prove that he acted with a depraved mind or an evil intent," said Denis de Vlaming, a Clearwater defense attorney. "That's a tremendously high burden for the facts as I know them."
Nevertheless, de Vlaming said he wasn't surprised Corey went for a murder charge.
In a highly scrutinized case complete with racial overtones and a public outcry for justice, the prosecutor went for the most serious charge she could, de Vlaming said. Even if a jury does not buy murder, they might settle on a lesser charge of manslaughter.
"It gives the jury some options," said Pinellas defense attorney Jay Hebert. "Typically it is difficult to prove a second-degree murder case where the person doesn't know the other person."
While second-degree murder requires prosecutors prove the "depraved mind" standard, manslaughter only requires they prove recklessness — that a defendant must have known the risks associated with his actions and done them anyway.
"In my opinion, it's going to be won or lost on forensics," de Vlaming said. "I would align as much forensic experience as I could possibly find on the issues."
That means finding witnesses — audio experts who can analyze the 911 calls, forensic pathologists who can examine Martin's wounds, and any witnesses who may have seen the attack.
But all the evidence presented publicly thus far has not provided a definitive answer of how the scuffle between Martin and Zimmerman transpired.
"It will be interesting to see what they have," Romine said. "Whatever evidence the prosecutor arrested him on, at some point the rest of the public will see it. What we all have to hope for is that the decisions being made are being made on the evidence and not on the uproar."
What we all have to hope for is that the decisions being made are being made on the evidence and not on the uproar
I'm not complaining about being in the centre of attention. In fact, I should be complaining not being in the centre of attention despite my pink glasses.
Because a Republican special prosecutor appointed by a Tea Party Republican governor is frequently influenced by the complaints of blacks of a highly discriminatory justice system, instead of the pursuit of justice for the victim no matter the color?
Off to prison for whitey. We don't want to set a precedent where victims of crime think they can defend themselves. Come on, back in your cage with the other slaves - you'll die when we tell you to.
maybe next time don't stalk and shoot kids
Zimmerman is on the 2nd of 3 bites of the apple (not counting the numerous bites available on apeal). The first bite was to convince the prosecutor not to charge him. He lost that. Next is a stand your ground motion decided by the judge. If he loses that, he gets a third bite before the jury.Do we know if Zimmerman gets two bites at the "stand your ground" apple? First, at a hearing to determine if there is enough evidence to throw out the charge and second to convince a jury to aquit if a judge is not willing to throw it out?
Or, if a judge is not willing to throw it out, does Zimmerman lose any chance of self defense and will at that point essentially be looking to avoid second degree versus manslaughter, with added penalties in play due to other factors?
Does anyone have an opinion as to the evidentary value of the 911 recording in regard to who was crying for help? In the real, rather than the CSI world, can forensic science pin down with any certainity whoose voice that was?