This video is a complete mess. The author moves between arguing for a position and then arguing against that position by using statements that are the exact opposite of what he had previously expressed, and yet in his head he seems to maintain the opinion that he's making coherent points.
As an example, first he argues that that Detroit: Become Human is definitely an allegory to the Civil Rights Movement (which I agree it is, but not a perfectly analogous one), and then he goes on to explain why it's a bad allegory - because it's not perfectly analogous.
He simultaneously claims that because there is some inspiration from the civil rights movement, they must have wanted to recreate it accurately, and that they've failed to do so because it does not accurately portrait the civil rights movement. That "goal" was probably never there in the first place, the author of the video simply made it up in his head.
Why do you watch that?
Anyway, at least the gfx look nice.