As mentioned, there are no original manuscripts (known as autograph in Christian theology), just copies of copies of, indeed, an originally oral tradition. Not surprising considering Jesus' eschatological views, which incorporated the expected 'end of the world' and the arrival of the Messiah, in accordance with Judaic tradition. As this obviously did not occur, a crisis ensued, eventually resulting in a non- and even anti-Jewish church and the establishment of canonic writings, including the four gospels and the letters and acts now present in most present-day bibles. More or less simultaneously, the church developed a patriarchical hierarchical organization, henceforth excluding women from leading positions, and an orthodox (i.e. righteous) doctrine, excluding dissenting views - such as those practised by the gnostics - as heretic. (In a nutshell.)
The Dead Sea scrolls shed a different light on Jesus, as many non-canonical (i.e. apocryphical) gospels did, for instance as concerns his being either human or divine, having a divine and human person, or being entirely divine (to name but a few).
So, in essence, Masada and Cheezy the Wiz are correct.
.
